Search results

More times than that even. Yet Ignatius had a different idea than Paul. At least, I can explain his confusion better.

I study it all the time, and I don't think there is one translation that is trustworthy.

How was the God in the Messiah? This is first said by Ignatius of Antioch.

No, that just Origen's version of the Septuagint, and the response in the LXX was like Greek article ο Greek participle ων. A one who was doing that. True, the Hebrew has the word YHWH which few know what it means. It is related to the 2 causative Aramaic forms of 'to be'. 1 past tense and 1...

Capital and lower case letters are a rediculous contrivance. But YHWH and LORD are all capital. But Jesus and Lord are not. The word in John 1:1 except 1:1c ο λογος ουτος a word another is the God. Jesus is a different word and wasn't in the beginning like a freak Hellenic mangod. Scripta...

That the Greek article is misrendered as definite, and there is an assumption mass nounage really hurts the bible in every English translation. For every passage used to prove the deityhood of the messiah, there are 3 that contradict the observation. There are major deficencies in logic. E.g. in...

Which less in smaller caps and doesn't mean close to the name YHWH. Proof of nothing here.

διὰ Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ with Jesus the messiah οὗτός another whom ἐστιν πάντων κύριος is of all the lord. LORD is never in caps to describe him.

What is ignorant is believing the Greek and Hebrew articles are definitive.

Humans use Logoi at the time and are individual words. But the Greek is more abstract, it can also be something which informs and has a name. OUTOS also is a demonstrative pronoun about another noun or named thing which does something similar. The problem is that all things, whatever that is...

And yet Justin Martyr thinks fire is the Jesus. He was wrong, and without it, there is no Jman except Jesus son of Nun

It is a Passover exercise for the early church. You don't understand it til you understand that the messiah is the yearling. HIs blood is given to wash for salvation. Using his blood was the atonements. Atonement is what man does, not God.

Or that he was explaining God to the gentiles who wanted to join Israel. The New Creation is the afterlife, then do you understand it?

You report what men say about God. Your delusion is that you think the English conveys the Hebrew in detail and very accurately.

So? Your statements are vague.

There are two LOGOI.

He is not the only one. He did not pre-exist. The HS is the begetter; this implies a spirit that is a father. Close to fully grown up at the least. This is sensitive information. Mary gave birth to a boy.

But perhaps you are delusional as you suggest.

I will never believe in globalism like the JWs ...?

Sarx does not include muscle. The worder Jesus who is the son of the worder YHWH, the highest God. It created another word(er) Yeshua.