Search results

Penal Substitutionary Atonement, AIONOS, and OLAM

The God, who is with us, is not a messianic name, and happens to be the advent of the gospel. I disagree that it has to be a human being, and secondly, it is an event misinterpreted by the ECFs among other things.

And I gave you a quote from that source.

It's always luck. Look at Job.

What must it be like to think oneself special for believing the trinity doctrines?

Paul didn't write his letters in Aramaic.

Obedience doesn't save either, but it does put you in the right place in the afterlife.

τοῦ μεγάλου θεοῦ καὶ σωτῆρος ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ

of a great God, and of ours, the savior the Messiah Jesus.

Even Hindus have the wrong belief system. I don't think they are hell-bound.

Manuscripts or different rendering of OLAM...? I am checking. Lexical discrepancies. ἀπ᾽ ἀρχῆς ἐξ ἡμερῶν αἰῶνος from the start of the permanenting days. OLAM is not eternal but rather permanent or make something permanent. Permanent punishment or chastisement would be a behavior correction that...

"God is with us" It is not a person, but rather an action. God was certainly with them. i.e. Israel.

The indefinite article can be thought of as meaningless noun which introduces another name and noun. One is sometimes an indefinite article, but has a bit of meaning.

Latin and English was used to reconstruct the Greek. It isn't perfect, but I have a hard time believing mistakes in manuscripts were tolerated before the age of typos and printing.

I discovered a post-trib rapture concurrent with the fall of the temple. I don't like the answer, but I endorse it.

[Jhn 3:2 KJV] 2 The same came to Jesus by night, and said unto him, Rabbi, we know that thou art a teacher come from God: for no man can do these miracles that thou doest, except God be with him.

Ignatius was an interesting Valentinian with his weird theology. I like him for historical reasons. I have heard the syrian versions are key to knowing what he really worded.

Yes he YHWH reconciled at the messiah, to his own self Israel. The rest proves only the sonship.

εγω ειμι was the response given.

It is my opinion that false teaching has been taught in English since Tyndale. I respect Tyndale, but not his theology.