Search results

The answer to what the unforgivable is can be found at the end of that scripture in Mark 3:30.

Only those that have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ, and are therefore in Christ.

I'm not a protestant either

Believe what you like. Goodbye

It's the fool that believes lies and follows the traditions of man instead of the word of God. Sounds like Catholics to me, which I am not.

Don't compare prophesy with Catholic tradition.

Believe whatever man made-up nonsense and traditions you like. I'll adhere to the inspired written word of God and that only. Goodbye

Your counter arguments make no logical, scriptural, sense and are simply your views. There are many people that say keys "to" and not "of" the kingdom which I've heard personally over the years, using the terms interchangeably. There are also a few bible translations such as the NAB that say...

He first and foremost doesn't understand Mat 16:18. These are not proofs or validity. Read my previous detailed posting on this very subject of Peter, Mat 16. etc.. here is my response to his skewed view of this subject. This is a repost of an OP of mine posted here and elsewhere, so it may be...

It's not biblical yet millions of people seem to think so. That's your answer to regarding "nobody made that claim". On the contrary, many, many make that claim all the time and many make it a point to "go to church" once a year to celebrate that very day. This discussion has gotten dumb and...

There clearly is a possibility of disavowing Christ which the Hebrew Christians were warned of doing so in the Hebrew letter and were cautioned that in doing so it was impossible to renew them again to repentance.

It's wrong when those that claim it's of a scriptural origin when it isn't. It has nothing to do with posts. The original post asked where Christmas came from to which I replied not the bible but man. And mankind that reveres Christmas do so with the false understanding that it's origin is the...

The early church was a fledgling body and had to share documents and information as noted in letters of the NT whereby they were to be shared and read. Why? Because the scriptures as we know them today dud not exist, not that there was some central body set up to govern all. No different than...

There was in fact a council at Jerusalem because it was the only church and first church established but it had no power or authority over other congregations established elsewhere. And the only early church writings that have any validity are the scriptures of the bible. And you are...

In general terms, there is no problem with any scripture, only man's inability to understand or accept that which was written. The problem is with man.

Youll find no such universal organization in the NT nor authority of anyone to bind anything on anyone, or things that aren't bound on Christians by the word of God. Church congregations are autonomous and self governing in accordance with the scriptures, abd the outline prescribed thereby, or...

Read the account of Simon the sorcerer in Acts 8. He was a baptized believer meaning he was saved and was told to repent or perish because of his sin.

You're not making good sense. The question is about the origin of Christmas, which has been turned into a supposed religious holiday with it's origin being scriptural, which it isn't and untrue. You can believe the falsehoods if you like and give undue reverence to that day if you like, but that...

Not the bible, so if not the bible it has to be man.

But it also was a baptism for the remission of sins as described in Acts 2:38. It's identical to the baptism of John as per Luke 3:3 the difference being baptized into Christ in Acts 2:38 for the remission of sins which also gives you the gift of the Holy Ghost and the Lord adds you to the...