Search results

I cannot disagree. I just do not know. Romans 11:23: “And they also, if they do not continue in unbelief, will be grafted in, for God is able (dunatos) to graft them in again.” First of all: this is a conditional promise. The writer here qualifies this important statement by saying “if.” This...

Enoch is not Scripture You obviously have nothing.

Where are their bodies?

Are the bride of Christ and the OT saints physically there?

Does "all" mean all? Yes or no?

I have never disregarded the creation account. It does not prove or negate any eschatological position. What has that to do with the return of Christ? You make so many obscure and irrelevant arguments. Obviously you are struggling to prove your case. In the flood, all the wicked were...

How? Where?

Hello! Their bodies are there. Read 1 Thess 4. You are destroying your own doctrine by making such statements. All that are in the graves saved and lost are raised When Jesus returns. That is if you take the text literal - which we are finding Premils do not. They butcher Scripture to suit...

There is one singular general resurrection when Jesus comes. This is the end. The wicked are destroyed. There is no imaginary 1000 years in-between in. Check the text. Jesus explains in John 5:28-29, “Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear...

I rest my case! There is therefore no other first resurrection in Scripture. Any other is second or more.

Who cares whether some of the early Church fathers promoted it or not? What does that prove? It was an extra-biblical theory. Enough said!

You are ducking around the obvious to support your false teaching. Denying the "resurrection" of Christ is the "first" is grievous. Who is "the first that should rise" in Acts 26:23? Who is "the firstborn from the dead" in Colossians 1:18? Who is "the firstfruits of them that slept" in 1...

Talk about twisting Scripture to support your error!!! Talk about doing your best to dethrone Christ from His heavenly kingship!!! This is why every reader should run from Premil. The ruling of Christ over His enemies is an ongoing process since His ascension. Wicked men die every day but more...

This joins the wealth of evidence that Premils are not literalistists. For them to be so would force them to take the Bible literal and accept the coming of the Lord as climactic. Many testify that they are Premillennial because they take the Word of God literally, yet, when you put their...

Exactly! As i said: this is a non-corroborative theory. It invents an age between this age and the age to come that will never occur. It is based on a wrong reading of one chapter in the most symbolic setting in the whole of Scripture - three chapters before the end of the Bible.

And? That does not suggest after that is over then there is going to be a time of Jewish salvation. That occurs as the Gentiles come in. The sign of the end is the nations will all hear, then comes the end.

Ok. 1. Where in the Bible do you consider definitely corroborate the Premillennial interpretation of Revelation 20 that there are two distinct physical resurrection days (the first for the righteous, the second for the wicked) separated by a literal 1000 years+? 2. Where in the Bible does it...

Another Premil invention because they have zero corroboration for their opinion of Revelation 20. Talk about twisting Scripture.

Where do you get that?

Op Note You can see how those who pretend that angels and demons are not real distinct spiritual entities diverse from man have no answer to the truth. Their silence is deafening. Here are more questions to add to the many avoided questions. How can redeemed spirits (elect angels in your...