Search results

Those who disagree have no NT warrant to argue otherwise.

Some Amils are building on that with a mistranslation of Zechariah 14. That is it. Therefore, there is nothing to support such a claim. I have presented this many times and it has not been refuted. Zechariah 14 occurred 2000 years ago. Zechariah 14:1 declares, “Behold, the day of the LORD...

Zechariah 14:2-3 says, “For I will gather all nations against Jerusalem to battle; and the city shall be taken, and the houses rifled, and the women ravished; and half of the city shall go forth into captivity, and the residue of the people shall not be cut off from the city. Then shall the LORD...

I have seen some Amils assume that to explain Zechariah 14. But the text does not say "day of the Lord" in the original but "a day is coming for the LORD."

I understand. Spiritualizing is only wrong if it is explaining away a literal reality. And, yes, many Christians do that to support false teaching - normally end-time teaching. I did not direct that at anything you wrote. The term "the day of the Lord" in both the OT and the NT normally refers...

The day that Jesus returns is an actual day. The Bible calls it “the last day” (singular). This is presented in direct contrast to “the last days” (plural). Basically, it is the final day of the last days. It is not a figurative indefinite day. After all, time concludes at the last trumpet. When...

On top of my own studies, and like others here, i use multiple theological and scholarly resources when coming to biblical conclusions.

This is so petty and infantile.

There are 2 events in Matt 24 - AD70 and the one final future coming of Christ. He believes this is talking about the end.

The broad meaning of the word is the broad meaning of the word. Fact! Thayer is not the final authority on any given passage, the Holy Spirit is. He is only speculating like each of us. He has no more insight on this passage than us. Also, i struggle with the fact he does not believe in the...

They have put their trust in that. So delusional!

This is a joke. Now that Premils have lost the online debate they have resorted to trying to get Chat GPT to rescue their doctrine from the abyss. It can only present what is fed into it from online sites, most of which are skewed and erroneous. Why not ask it what it thinks about abortion...

I see a validity in each of the arguments. I just do not take serious Full Preterists parading themselves as superior biblical authorities when they have a constant boring bias unobjective fixation with AD70 and the coming of Titus. They pretend to be authorities when they in fact heretically...

Of course not. But it felt like you were elevating him as some great trusted reliable authority with a superior insight to each of us. I do not respect anyone who denies the inerrancy of Scripture.

Like I have repeated: there are broad varying meanings given with each lexicon and commentator. BTW, you didn't answer my question: You do know he disagreed with the position of biblical inerrancy?

The word interpreted “generation” is broader than many acknowledge. Both the Greek words genos and genea can refer to race – as in the Jewish race – or "the successive members of a particular genealogy." It can also refer to a type of people who share the same traits. We find this in both the...

What about heaven and earth passing away (v35)?

Is 2 Peter 3 the same? Is there any of this that is literal in your opinion?

You do know he disagreed with the position of biblical inerrancy?

This is all bias noise. I refer you back to my last post. Please answer the avoided points/questions above.