Search results

Where is your evidence? Your statement? I do not think so! This is called private interpretation in Scripture.

The early father's saw it the way Amils do today. Tertullian the early Church father who was Chiliast recognized Zechariah 14 as an historic passage fulfilled at the first advent, saying, “But ‘at night He went out to the Mount of Olives.' For thus had Zechariah pointed out: 'And His feet shall...

Zechariah 14:1 declares, “Behold, the day of the LORD cometh, and thy spoil shall be divided in the midst of thee.” There are strong grounds for relating this to the great victory that was wrought through Christ’s sinless life, His atoning death and His victorious resurrection. In keeping with...

This has been refuted many times by Amils. And it has been ducked around many times by Premils. Zechariah 14 occurred 2000 years ago. Zechariah 14:1 declares, “Behold, the day of the LORD cometh, and thy spoil shall be divided in the midst of thee.” Hinneh Behold yowm- day baa' cometh...

There is rarely a theological argument presented by Premils explaining their position on Revelation 20 that does not submit Zechariah 14 as supporting evidence for their position. Premils talk as if these two texts fit together neatly to support their viewpoint. The only problem is, careful...

Past!

Yea right! God was ignorant of what He created???

You guys talk so cryptically. I wonder why? Why do you avoid post after post that refutes your arguments? So, are unregenerate humans demons? What are angels? Are we angels? Or, do angels possess us?

You make Satan out to be as eternal as God is. You make God the source of evil. You make God out to unrighteously advocate that Satan, demons and evil were (and obviously still are) "very good."

Apparently Satan, evil and sin are very good in God's eyes. He has created his own Bible.

This is the first subject I've ever seen rwb avoid multiple posts and multiple questions. That is because he is promoting error.

Satan is different from the human spirit. Have a look at each passage you quote. It exposes your doctrine. You're expanding Christadelphianism.

More avoidance, more Christdedephianism, more nonsense.

It is like debating Pretribbers with you and TS. You totally avoided the evidence. Isaiah 14:3-11: “And it shall come to pass in the day that the LORD shall give thee rest from thy sorrow, and from thy fear, and from the hard bondage wherein thou wast made to serve, That thou shalt take up...

Are "angels" the "spirits" within the righteous and the wicked? Basically: are "demons" (or "evil angels") the spirits of the wicked? Are "elect angels" the spirits of the righteous?

If Adam and Eve were created perfect, and became sinners of their free will when they disobeyed God, how do you reconcile the contradiction? Will you also ignore the contradiction because it does not fit your doctrine? This is the main point of the discussion that continues to go unanswered.

Are "angels" the "spirits" within the righteous and the wicked? Basically: are "demons" (or "evil angels") the spirits of the wicked? Are "elect angels" the spirits of the righteous?

It is like debating Pretribbers with you and TS. You totally avoided the evidence. Isaiah 14:3-11: “And it shall come to pass in the day that the LORD shall give thee rest from thy sorrow, and from thy fear, and from the hard bondage wherein thou wast made to serve, That thou shalt take up...

Are "angels" the "spirits" within the righteous and the wicked? Basically: are "demons" (or "evil angels") the spirits of the wicked? Are "elect angels" the spirits of the righteous?

The book of Hebrews was likely written between A.D. 64 and 69. Satan and his demons had long-rebelled against God and righteousness by then. That statement therefore related exclusively to the elect angels. The objective Bible student will see that.