Search results

That's another of your doctrine's assumptions! I don't believe the Scriptures says that what was at hand/near speaks about the second coming of the Lord. That which was near and even at hand is the gospel of the spiritual Kingdom of God that all mankind might know and enter when they hear...

Here again you're assuming! That which was and is soon coming is the spiritual Kingdom of God in heaven as it is being built as the Church proclaims the gospel of the Kingdom of God unto all the nations of the earth. That is the Kingdom of God that Christ came to earth with.

But you are making an assumption! Assuming the temple being measured is the Old Covenant temple in Jerusalem. Since the advent of Christ's cross and resurrection we find that not only is Christ the True Temple, we also who are found to be in Him through His Spirit are also. John 2:19-21...

Again deflecting! You're the one arguing the prophesy will be literally fulfilled in the future. The burden is on you, for he who alleges must prove.

The passage in Ro 11 does not say that Christ lifts the partial blindness. It simply says that when the fullness of the Gentiles come in so all Israel shall be saved. The blindness in Israel is only partial because there has always been an elect remnant from Israel (faithful) that shall be...

This is reading into the text that which is not there. The passage makes no mention the hardened of Israel recognizing Jesus as their Messiah. How can all Isreal be of those hardened of Israel since "all Israel that shall be saved" is saved when "the fullness of the Gentiles be come in." That...

Would not the tribes listed have still existed during the days of Christ's cross, resurrection, and ascension? Revelation 7:3 (KJV) Saying, Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, till we have sealed the servants of our God in their foreheads. Revelation 14:1 (KJV) And I...

I don't find that to be true! Your doctrine is dependent upon the early completion for the book. Otherwise, there would be no consideration for John having finished the Revelation before 70 AD.

There is not consensus by Bible scholars to prove even Rev was complete before 70 AD. I agree with the opinion of the late dating for the completion of The Revelation. You argue the two witnesses and all surrounding them recorded by John in the Revelation is history, but there is no biblical...

Whosoever among all of humanity who believe in Christ through His Gospel proclaimed in the power of the Holy Spirit! "Ye MUST be born again"!

But you're arguing the prophesy of the two witnesses is history. Do you now believe this prophesy and all surrounding it shall be literally/physically fulfilled in the future?

I'm compelled to point out the many problems we find with this very imaginative interpretation. If this is history, why is there no record in Scripture of their corpses laying in the street because the people who witnessed this would not allow their bodies to be buried? Where do we read of...

Will these two resurrected witnesses be immortal & incorruptible? Because Scripture indicates that NONE shall be bodily resurrected until and hour coming when the last trumpet sounds and time shall be no longer. Scripture also tells us that man dies once and after that the judgment. John...

The lamp is indeed the WORD of God! The oil believers are all anointed with is the Holy Spirit of God. With which every true believer is chosen to be a witness for Christ, proclaiming unto all the earth the gospel of the Kingdom of God. That Kingdom is only made known and spiritually entered...

This sounds like you're guessing! If the book of Revelation so clearly says these two will be two "real people" returned from the dead, please provide chapter and verse so we can all know who these risen prophets shall be!

Prove what you allege! Name these two anointed prophets that will return from the dead!

You loathe symbolism except when YOU need to make the candlesticks and olive trees SYMBOLIZE two men.

I have no desire to go into detail for you regarding my understanding of Rev 11, I feel it would be like speaking to the wall. I will simply say, just as I understand two lampstands and two olive trees symbolically pertain to spiritual realities, so too the rest of the chapter can only be...

Since I've already told you how I have come to understand dead bodies standing upon their feet, it would be far more useful to know how you interpret these questions. Because you prove that you believe the two candlesticks and two olive are symbolic for two human individuals that shall come at...

You're deflecting, why? I understand the difficulty you face; you tried to prove from the Bible why you believe the two candlesticks and two olive trees are two men of flesh & blood, but your argument falls flat. He who alleges must prove!