Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. R

    Can any of you link or share a good argument against FULL preterism?

    How does quoting Zechariah prove the two olive trees and two lampstands are literally two anointed men? Clearly, you understand that Revelation is written using symbolic language throughout, that's why you interpret the two olive trees and two lampstands as symbolically representing two men...
  2. R

    Amil interpretation of 2 Peter 3:10-12 vs Genesis 9:15

    Look at more context to determine the time period for which the parable was spoken. Luke 19:8-10 (KJV) And Zacchaeus stood, and said unto the Lord; Behold, Lord, the half of my goods I give to the poor; and if I have taken any thing from any man by false accusation, I restore him fourfold...
  3. R

    Amil interpretation of 2 Peter 3:10-12 vs Genesis 9:15

    At the time of Noah's flood, it was the world of the ungodly, that utterly perished, because only the ungodly were left alive on the earth after the ark was filled. The same shall be true when Christ comes again, and the fiery wrath of God that shall come down from heaven will utterly destroy...
  4. R

    Amil interpretation of 2 Peter 3:10-12 vs Genesis 9:15

    See replies #2, 5, 7 & 12 in this thread
  5. R

    Can any of you link or share a good argument against FULL preterism?

    If you wish to be taken seriously, Christ calls the two witnesses olive trees and lampstands prophesying a thousand two hundred and threescore days, clothed in sackcloth. What biblical proof texts can you provide to prove they are literally two human beings?
  6. R

    Amil interpretation of 2 Peter 3:10-12 vs Genesis 9:15

    You argue the flood was local, but in doing so you ignore explicit verses that prove your assumption in err! God did not say the entire planet would perish along with Jerusalem in 70 AD.
  7. R

    Can any of you link or share a good argument against FULL preterism?

    No! Full Preterism seeks to read its preconceived doctrine into the Word of God. You do NOT read the NT as it was meant, rather you use the NT to try to force fit your preconceived assumptions and opinions. It's far more beneficial that I show those reading these forums how FP twist and...
  8. R

    Can any of you link or share a good argument against FULL preterism?

    Christ speaks of only ONE "great tribulation" that shall come upon the Church as faithful saints proclaim the gospel of the Kingdom of God to all the nations of the earth. The warning of "great tribulation" was given first and foremost to the disciples with Christ, and to every new disciple...
  9. R

    Can any of you link or share a good argument against FULL preterism?

    Significant difference! The purpose for the Reformation was not to bring a whole new doctrine as Full Preterism does. The Reformation sought to return to the doctrines of the Bible and correct the doctrines of man. Full Preterits believe the Bible, especially the Revelation of Jesus Christ...
  10. R

    Amil interpretation of 2 Peter 3:10-12 vs Genesis 9:15

    Whether humans covered the globe or not is irrelevant! The fact remains that every living breathing creature left upon the earth when the flood waters came utterly perished. Only those who were in the ark were spared! So it shall be when the fiery judgment of God comes down upon the earth...
  11. R

    Can any of you link or share a good argument against FULL preterism?

    I quite familiar with the unbiblical doctrine of Full Preterits! It basically finds its beginnings through Jesuit writers in the 16th and 17the century. The doctrine became prominent as a counter-Reformation through the Jesuit Luis de Alcasar . In a nutshell Full Preterits view much...
  12. R

    Amil interpretation of 2 Peter 3:10-12 vs Genesis 9:15

    How do you reconcile a localized flood in days of Noah with what is written? 2 Peter 3:4-7 (KJV) And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. For this they willingly are ignorant of...
  13. R

    Can any of you link or share a good argument against FULL preterism?

    You hold to teachings from the Bible that we share the same understanding of, but what you have presented here is no more biblical than the doctrine of Full Preterits! I won't waste my time AGAIN showing you from the Word of God who/what the two witnesses represent.
  14. R

    Can any of you link or share a good argument against FULL preterism?

    It's a waste of time trying to show how inconsistent and contradictory your doctrine is! Your doctrine does not come from the Word of God; it is forced into the Word of God. Because you approach the Bible with a preconceived opinion and lack the honesty to admit your doctrine turns the Word of...
  15. R

    Can any of you link or share a good argument against FULL preterism?

    The problem with this statement is that it too forces contradiction into the Word of God! I didn't mention "their" age! Because Scripture is clear that Christ shall not come until the "last day" of this age! If Christ had come again at the end of "their" age, there would not have been...
  16. R

    Can any of you link or share a good argument against FULL preterism?

    It appears you don't have understanding of how those who are indwelt with the Spirit of Christ have the ability to spiritually discern the Scriptures. Having spiritual discernment through the Spirit of Christ in me comes from study and knowing what is written in His Word. For instance when we...
  17. R

    Can any of you link or share a good argument against FULL preterism?

    Problem is Josephus, like AI was not a believer, and did not have the Holy Spirit of God teaching him, his writings therefore cannot be used apart from the Holy Word of God because his writing was NOT under the inspiration of God as our Bible is. What he writes regarding the physical history of...
  18. R

    Can any of you link or share a good argument against FULL preterism?

    It's even better when we are able to understand things of God through His Spirit within teaching us! That's one of the problems with so many eschatological assumptions! Take Full Preterits for example. You read the Scriptures using only what you naturally know through physical mind. When...
  19. R

    Can any of you link or share a good argument against FULL preterism?

    There's a BIG difference between our natural living spirit that gives our body physical life and the supernatural Spirit that guides believers unto biblical truths! I don't dismiss AI, it is very real and still relatively unknown how it will impact the human race. My point is that we cannot...
  20. R

    Can any of you link or share a good argument against FULL preterism?

    In his analogy of seeds Paul speaks of the seeds (as many) of Abraham as children of the flesh, and of those being born again of Abraham's one supernatural SEED that is Christ. Those born of the flesh (natural seeds) are not the children of God, but those born again of the Spirit (supernatural...