Search results

"Mumbo-Jumbo" Elementary Lesson: Lamb = Jesus Sheep or Wheat = Christians Tares = Ungodly or Demons Bread = God's Word Mumbo-Jumbo advanced question #1 If "flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God", in what form did "Christ the Firstfruits" go to inherit it?

Acts prompted by the Holy Spirit promote the greater works of God toward His greater purpose for creating the world. While the good acts of otherwise good people, are lesser acts as they are limited to this world, as compared with God and the kingdom of God which is greater.

You can repeat your error all you want--that's on you. But since you are determined to do so, for the sake of anyone reading along--you lied about what I said, and it is a pattern. Therefore, I leave you to your lies, and turn you over to the father of lies.

That is wrong, and is contrary to the prophecies of Daniel and John, regarding what was sealed and only to be revealed just before the sounding of the seventh angel.

According to scripture, what was "sufficient" 2,000 years ago was not all that would be revealed, the last of which would not come until the seventh angel, when he is about to sound.

No. Pay attention. You apparently only heard what you wanted to hear that fits your accusations. I corrected you on this already. What I said (not many times but once) was that I confirmed your accusation about going beyond scripture, correcting you and clarifying, that yes I go beyond what was...

I didn't have to backtrack. You misspoke, calling me what you assumed to be a claim I never made...in the negative, only based on your own understanding and what you merely believe is true. It is true that I have said plenty. But I have done so as a witness giving my testimony, and saying what...

That is a lie. I never "claimed to be a prophet."

You have consistently denied the sealed prophecies of Daniel and John against what is written of them only being revealed just before the sounding of the seventh angel, even saying they were already revealed in the book of Revelation, completely against what John wrote. Which are all a part of...

Quoted for the record.

Who puts a limit to the truth outside the camp? Non-Christians should know better. But no, this rodeo only happens because there are things in the scriptures you deny while making false claims to the contrary--things that would not be revealed until thousands of years after your doctrine was...

True, and those who categorically deny "all" are just as bad, for both are against God in their own way.

Bingo--right on! Peter even elaborated that with God the days and years are ostensible, possibly even being the opposite of what one thinks. While what should be apparent, is that all things with God simply occur in the fullness of time. And yes, so many mistakes of interpretation of God's...

Which would be irresponsible to quote without also quoting: 1 Thessalonians 5:19 "Do not quench the Spirit."

Yeah, like I said--that's what you said--rejecting "all."

"Every eye will see Him" Revelation 1:7 past, present, and future. Every eye. But let the reader understand--the qualifying point of this passage is not seeing Him in this world, but "coming with the clouds of heaven", meaning: in the spirit. In other words, when all are spiritually raised up...

Yes...the readers should evaluate for themselves: Now I have quoted you twice.

And yet One is true. But you have denied--in your own words, "all." True. For Messiah, is "God with us"; and your god apparently is not my God...or you would heard His voice.

More accusations.

Another accusation. I quoted you saying that the book of Revelation was sufficient as recorded 2,000 years ago--sufficient without what was sealed. Which is not a quote--you just conveniently left it out.