Search results

You forgot something. It's called Scripture...which I supplied.

Singular "war". The war between the Jews and Romans leading up to 70 AD. Not the plural "wars" of which Jesus spoke.

You still haven't explained why you replaced "war" with "wars" in the passage. Let's see if you can explain that before we proceed further.

Misnaming "prince" as "ruler" in Daniel 9:26 only confuses Daniel's description. The Hebrew word for prince is "nagid", and it is identical to "nagid", describing Messiah the Prince, in Daniel 9:25. Thus, the only prince in the passage is Messiah, and the Romans were His people serving as His...

When you've trashed your Darby/Scofield spectacles so that you can read, let us know.

You're the one claiming a gap, so provide the evidence from Scripture and/or history, not from your Darby/Scofield imagination.

True. If so, where has the Knesset been meeting? Daniel 9:26 "...unto the end of the war desolations are determined." Better trash your Darby/Scofield spectacles.

It shows no gap. That is futurist fantasy. Like you're labeling Paul a Roman Catholic? So provide evidence of a WW2 calamity on the scale of the one the Jewish Virtual Library cited which occurred in 70 AD.

I'm playing your game. Aren't you enjoying your game any longer?

Link to the post in which I claim that "any male of a different ethnicity was grafted into the natural tree producing a second ethnicity in a Covenantal relationship with God that you claim diversified the ethnicity of Jacob." Link to the post in which I "keep implying the ethnicity of Jacob no...

True. What is "it", and what is the war?

You believe that Paul was a Roman Catholic, so he must have espoused anti-semitism as well.

How can that be when 70 immediately follows 69? Unless you're using the Darby/Scofield numbering system. How about you acknowledge history which confirms the Word of God?

I referred to saints, and you associated that with Roman Catholics. Paul referred to saints, and he also wrote Romans. So you believe that Paul was a Roman Catholic.

So you believe that Paul was a roman catholic because he referred to saints.

How can this be when the 70th week ended almost 2,000 years ago? From the Jewish Virtual LIbrary: "While the Romans would have won the war in any case, the Jewish civil war both hastened their victory and immensely increased the casualties. One horrendous example: In expectation of a Roman...

When do you plan to start? So why are you worshiping Darby and Scofield? They were men.

1 Corinthians 14:33 For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints. So you believe that when Paul referred to the saints, he was referring to the "roman catholic church". Keep those Bible smarts coming.

You're the one who brought them up. Document your own imaginations.

And you have the Scripture to prove that it didn't?