Search results

Too bad it NOT supported by the very Scriptures it purports to be ouur "Sole Authority". Besides - the Canon of Scripture is a Catholic Tradition . . .

This, coming from a proponent of the biggest doctrinal whopper of all - Sola Scriptura . . .

Gee - for a person who's always pontificating about how we need to get "dug into our Bibles" - you certainly DON'T know the Scriptures. Time for a Bible Lesson, son . . . Doesn’t Jesus specifically warn against calling anyone “Father” in Matt. 23:9? What, then, are we to call the man who sired...

And like your buddy @amigo de christo, you spew generalized epithets at Christ's Church but fail to point to anything specific. It's a cowardly way of debating. and has nothing to do with "truth" . . .

No, because I reject your premise as anti-Biblical.

Neither 1 Cor. 5:4-5 nor the documents from the Council of Trent say that. As I clearly stated before – BOTH refer to a Church discipline, with the aim of bringing the sinner BACK to the fold in repentance.

Another ignorant anti-Catholic vomiting out drivel about things you don't understand. Allow ne ti educate you . . . An anathema is not a "curse" or a "Hell sentence" - but a Biblical prescripton of ecclesial discipline. Paul explicitly states that unruly or otherwise morally-disobedient...

Ummmm, can you show me where the Bible lists all of the Books that belong in it? Here's a hint: You can't, because it took the Authority of the Catholic church, led by the Holy Spirit to declare the Canon of Scripture - not Sola Scriptura. How do you like them facts?

Yes - you certainly do . . .

And yet, you've NEVER been able to answer a single question. WHY is that? And, by the way - as fact is a fact. No such thing as "Catholic " facts . . .

She is certainly nicer than me and has more tolerance for ignorant liars . . .

No - get dug in CHRIST. You cannot know Him if all you have is Scripture and don't know His Church. Jesus is ONE with His Church (Acts 9:4-5) . . .

I only deal in facts. I have 2000 years of Scripture, Sacred Tradition and History on my side. All YOU have are perverted opinions based on YOUR personal interpretations . . .

You’re contradicting yourself ALL over the place. FIRST, you said that Christians need to be “dug in” to the Bible. After I educated you about the fact out that there was NO complete Bible for 300 years – YOU say that they had the Torah, as if that was sufficient. The Church, which is led to...

NEVER, it seems. He's all about the opinion . . .

Soooo, YOU think that the Torah is all that is necessary for a Christian to be “dug” into?? And, as I educated you earlier – they had MANY other Letters that were considered to be Scripture and were read aloud in Church communities for 300 tears. These Letters are now referred to as...

Noe, that’s a really impotent and historically-bankrupt response. Time for a History Lesson . . . There was NO declared Canon of Scripture until the 4th century – 383 AD, to be exact. Before then, all the individual Church communities had had were individual Letters – and not every community...

And what would you have told the millions and millions of people living in the first 3 centuries when there was NO Bible? And what would youhave tolde the millions and millions of people who didn't have Bible for the nest 1200 years because there was NO printing press and therefoe, NO ability...

Tyical non-answer . . . On other words - you don't have a valid response for the historical spanking @Illuminator gave you. You guys are great at pointing fingers and hurling false accusatjons. But when it comes to giving answers - you never seem to have any . . .

Soooo, when you’re challenged to supply an authoritative source – you collapse like a house of cards. That’s what I thought . . . I got MY scientific information from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). I’ll take that over your skewed SDA nonsense ANY day of the week.