Search results

You did not answer the question.

Thanks for the guffaw. Are you offering sacrifices?

The great tribulation of Matthew 24 was the destruction of Jerusalem. There is no antichrist or false prophet in Matthew 24. The abomination of desolation was the Roman armies (Luke 21:20). They were not "set up".

I tell you. I don't care that you don't care about numbers. I attempted to quote that without emitting a guffaw. I was unsuccessful. Who's/What's right? 1. Seventeen centuries of defenders of the true Christian faith 2. One modern cultic denier Who needs a hint? Hint: Seventeen centuries...

Do you understand that you are in denial of the unanimous testimony of 17 centuries of every recognized defender of the historic true Christian faith, who were united in their recognition of the fulfillment of Joel's prophecy in Acts 2?

You don't have the last word. God does. Hebrews 10:8-14

I asked God that. He pointed me to His Last Word on the subject in Scripture. Hebrews 10 8 Above when he said, Sacrifice and offering and burnt offerings and offering for sin thou wouldest not, neither hadst pleasure therein; which are offered by the law; 9 Then said he, Lo, I come to do thy...

Brother, the word "antichrist" does not appear in the Scriptures you cited. John is the only one to use and define the term. The Protestant Reformers recognized the apostate Roman papacy as the fulfillment of the applicable portions of Daniel 7 and 2 Thessalonians 2. Consistent with John...

John confirmed that it was hearsay. No one disagreed with him.

They had heard that antichrist shall come. Their understanding was based not on evidence, but on hearsay. John proceeded to demonstrate the error of that hearsay with evidence of how to recognize antichrists, of which there were already many. And always will be. John was not a Jesuitized...

Of course. And Isaiah 53 took place in the NT. You maintain that the OT can be understood without the NT. That is demonstrably false for Isaiah 53.

Who would comprehend this in the absence of the NT? Isaiah 53 1 Who hath believed our report? and to whom is the arm of the Lord revealed? 2 For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant, and as a root out of a dry ground: he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, there...

Then leave it for those who do get it.

Chicken or egg? The issue is that they did not believe and understand the OT until Jesus' NT explanation and illumination.

It certainly does follow. Did Jesus' followers ultimately stop offering sacrifices after Calvary? Where in the OT were they told to stop offering sacrifices?

Who are "they"? By what characteristics does God identify "they"? 1. DNA 2. Culture 3. Community 4. Religion Something else?

Do you sacrifice animals? If you don't believe that the NT is necessary to understand the OT, then you should be sacrificing animals. Are you?

The passage disproves your point. They couldn't understand the prophets until Jesus of the NT opened their understanding. Luke 24 45 Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures.

Talk about an exercise in futility. :laughing:

These couldn't. Do you think that you can? Luke 24 25 Then he said unto them, O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken: 26 Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory? 27 And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded...