Search results

What support exists in historical orthodox Christianity for multiple gatherings?

Supporting Scripture?

Acts 10:34,35 is talking about Christian life.

Acts 2 22 Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know: 23 Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken...

There's very little text in post #3, but you haven't yet stopped running from it.

But He knew that man would sin. And He had Plan A ready for it. The Lamb slain from the foundation of the world. Revelation 13:8 No other plan necessary.

But there is in determinate counsel and foreknowledge.

"Plan" definition: to have in mind : INTEND Sounds like a plan to me.

No He didn't. Acts 2 22 Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know: 23 Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye...

The Gospel continued to be preached to the Jews first and alone for 3 1/2 years after Jesus' death and resurrection (Acts 3:25,26; Acts 13:46). Thereafter, beginning with the conversion of Cornelius, the Gentiles were included (Acts 11:18). Gentiles have been full and complete recipients of...

False. He is addressing the Church, using figurative descriptions unique to the Church. 1 Peter 2 5 Ye also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ.

Absolutely not. Romans 10:12 For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him. Galatians 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ...

No. Your claim violates the very essence of the definition of a covenant. So applying your definition to Korah's situation, he was in covenant with God, but God slew him anyway. Why? That's some strange God and covenant. That's not the God that I serve, and not the God with Whom I'm in...

God made His covenant with those within Israel who were faithful and obedient to Him, such as the 7,000 Baal rejectors. No others.

Were Korah and his followers "chosen"?

Salvation by DNA? God is not a racist. The nation of Israel was comprised of both descendants and non-descendants of Abraham from its birth and throughout its history. God slew both without distinction when they rebelled and disobeyed.

It is impossible for anyone who does not recognize Jesus to be the Christ, the Messiah to be "elect", for that recognition is the very essence of the definition of elect. Otherwise, I concur with your recognition of the elect as those of faith and obedience in and to Christ, irrespective of...

After more than three millennia since Abraham of natural genetic diffusion and dispersion, Abraham's DNA is ubiquitous in every individual on earth. So if you're defining Hebrews as Abraham's genetic progeny, then the entire human race is Hebrew. What two gatherings of the entire human race...

See post #3.

Provide a verbatim quote of any verse in which anyone addresses Paul as "father". Provide a verbatim quote of any verse in which anyone addresses Peter as "father". Provide a verbatim quote of any verse in which anyone addresses John as "father".