Search results

You can't even answer questions, nor remember your own posts. You said that the OT was fulfilled and made obsolete. Again: Was the OT fulfilled and made obsolete by the NT? If not, what has fulfilled and made obsolete the OT?

So that again leaves only you as the sole and exclusive repository of truth. :laughing: Call up the pope and tell him to vacate, because you're coming. :laughing: More one-man cultism.

Exodus 29:36 And thou shalt offer every day a bullock for a sin offering for atonement: and thou shalt cleanse the altar, when thou hast made an atonement for it, and thou shalt anoint it, to sanctify it. Before the Cross, was that an actual bullock and actual atonement?

So historic orthodox Christianity didn't have Scripture and the Holy Spirit and didn't listen to God. Only you do. Imagine that. More evidence of a one-man cult. Thanks for more guffaws. :laughing:

Never did I claim that the Cross happened twice. That is another of your deliberate misrepresentations. Or do you believe that the Lamb was slain before creation on a cross? You didn't tell us. Rather, I used your illogic to show that the Lamb was slain twice. You claim that He was slain...

Exodus 29:36 And thou shalt offer every day a bullock for a sin offering for atonement: and thou shalt cleanse the altar, when thou hast made an atonement for it, and thou shalt anoint it, to sanctify it. Was that a real live bullock and actual atonement? Or just your premil avoidance...

You'll be hearing from the online admin spirit.

You changed my original word "Forever" in your quote of my post 692, to "Since the Cross" in your post 715. Are you looking to get banned?

Does he or do you understand why God required animal sacrifices?

Incomprehensible nonsense. Copy/paste my verbatim quote in which you say I said "it was a certain point in time, like 3.5 years after the Cross, when time was complete." Beyond absurd. No, it didn't "always happen". It happened once (Hebrews 9:12,26,28), at Calvary, and has been in force and...

So historic orthodox Christianity does not have the Word of God, but you do. Imagine that. More evidence of a one-man cult. Thanks for the guffaws. :laughing:

The post I was responding to was about a Scriptural case. So you're agreeing that there was no Scriptural case for Bellarmine's claims? Thank God for the Reformation.

You were discussing purgatory, judgment, Protestantism, the Canon, et al. Why not Bellarmine?

Let's see your Scriptural case from Isaiah 9:6 for Jesuit Robert Bellarmine's exaltation of the papal antichrist: In English: “All names which in the scriptures are applied to Christ, by virtue of which it is established that he is over the church, all the same names are applied to the Pope.”...

What to believe? 1. Your cultic modernism 2. Historic orthodox Christianity Do you need a hint?

Did the NT fulfill and make obsolete the OT?

The RCC is not orthodox Christianity, otherwise the Reformation would have been unnecessary; but you cannot even demonstrate support from the RCC, let alone from orthodox Christianity. You're a one-man show frequently espousing your own flavor of cultic modernism.

True. What fulfilled it and made it obsolete?

So you conjured your own interpretations which are alien to historic orthodox Christianity. Yours don't use Scripture, which is why you cannot demonstrate support from historic orthodox Christianity.

Under the OT, God required animal sacrifices, and the word "atonement" was used to describe what they accomplished. If they served no purpose, why did God require them?