Search results

I Thessalonians 5:2-3: “the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night. For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.” Paul says, “the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his...

Premils have nothing of evidential worth to bring to the table. If they had, they would bring it. All they have is their own theological statements. Zechariah 14:16-21 says, “And it shall come to pass, that every one that is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall even go up...

LOL. I'll take that as an admission that you have nothing. The rest of us know that they do not correlate. Why can you not just be honest?

No. That is manipulating Scripture to support your beliefs. With that type of ad-hoc rational you could potentially invent 153 different religious groups. Frankly, it is ridiculous. It is unbiblical. Men are either saved or not. Those who are not born again are classed as ungodly, are of their...

Premils cannot even correlate Zechariah 14 and Revelation 20, never mind rebut the multiple Scriptures they duck around that show a climactic return of Christ. Thankfully, this will spell the end of sin and sinners, dying and crying, disease and decay, corruption and crime, riots and rebellion...

That is simply not true. Where does Scripture teach that? Mankind is split into two. Premillennialists do all types of theological gymnastics to negate that. Men are either saved or lost, righteous or unrighteous, sheep, or goats, wheat or tares. There is no in between. They will either be...

There is not rebuttal to that. Who can survive?

Can you do a comparison between the two?

Stop avoiding. Where do any of the ancient Chiliasts before AD 270 teach the Premil belief of Satan being cast down from heaven at the second coming? Where do any of the ancient Chiliasts before AD 270 teach the Premil belief of the binding of Satan at the second coming? Where do any of the...

He is not coming as Savior the next time, He is coming as judge. It is the end. He's coming to destroy.

David was predicting the heavenly reign of Christ at the right hand of majesty on high in Ps 110:1 . That was 1000 years before Jesus actually come. So what is the issue? He would sit at the right hand until ... Hello? What is difficult about that. He is there now. He is reigning now. He is king...

Where does Jesus promise here to restore nationhood (or a theocracy) to Israel? Nowhere! Again, you force your beliefs into the text. Christ’s reply in this passage did not deny that the kingdom of God would be again manifested among natural Israelites, or that significant numbers of Israelites...

There is no reason to reinterpret the plain wording of Scripture. It speaks for itself. It is crystal clear. The whole context here is expressly speaking about the One that would assume David’s throne. It is speaking about the only One that could gloriously take it. Christ was that man. He was...

Really? So what do you believe then? Please don't tell me you are a Full Preterist. They are normally the type who come out with such claims.

As usual, you totally avoid the biblical evidence presented and just promote your own stuff

I see you also sidestepped my rebuttal of your claims on Acts 1. Acts 1:6-7 does not mention a future millennium. You're forcing that into the text. You do that with multiple Scriptures, because the Bible does not teach a future millennium. Such an interpretation is definitely not in keeping...

You are adding unto the text to support the error of Premil. You do that with multiple Scriptures. That is because you have zero corroboration for Premillennialism. You butcher the text to support your teaching. You play with words like the politicians to make white black and right wrong. The...

You have got one string to your guitar and it is making a monotonous sound. You cannot employ the other strings in order to enjoy the full function of the instrument. I showed you that Hebrews 2:8 tells us “For in that he put all in subjection under him, he left nothing that is not put under...

You have a faulty perception of the kingdom. You have bought into the lie the Pharisees taught and which caused many to reject Christ. They looked for a physical kingdom, a tyrannical Messiah. They were looking for a carnal earthly kingdom with a strong draconian militaristic Messiah that would...

Some Premillennialists try to explain away this clear passage that confirms Christ assumed David’s throne at the resurrection by arguing that the throne referred to in Acts 2:30 is not David’s throne, but the Father’s throne. But are they right? The passage in question states: “Therefore being a...