Search results

Whether YOU believe the above to be true or not is irrelevant. MY position all along during this argument had been that there is indeed a Particular Judgement that happens immediately after death. I have been inundated with opposing views stating everything from the idea that we “wait”...

And I've corected yout MANY ;loes and errords - but you still choose to believe the lied. I can only pray that the scales fall from your eyes.

It’s painfully-obvious that you haven’t actually READ any if my posts. I already explained where YOUR OY Canon of Scripture came from – and if you don’t believe me, you can check it out for yourself. Since you didn’t read it before – here it is again . . . After the destruction of Jerusalem, a...

I feel sorry for you for MANY reasons – not the least of which is your gullibility. Without your knowledge – you have been vomiting out the very DAME lies and fairy tales that were written over 100 years ago by a man names Alexander Hislop. He was an anti-Catholic ignoramus who wrote a book...

THANK YOU for once again proving that you are unable to refute – or even address my poinr.

They follow the very same NT Canon that was declared at the Synod of Rome in 383AD. Luther wanted to remove the Epistles of James and Jude and Revelation from the New Testament. He particularly disliked James because of its emphasis on works interfered with Luther’s newly-invented doctrine of...

The Canon of Scripture that we should follow is the one declared by the supreme earthly Authority, His Church (Matt. 16:18-19, Matt. 18:15-18, Luke 10:16, John 16:12-15, John 20:21-23). The NT Canon of Scripture that Protestants adhere to is the one declared by the Catholic church in 383AD at...

In other words - you can't refute a SINGLE thing I said. Good job, Einstein . . .

This means that they will not be condemned or judged negatively. The Greek woed (ἔρχεται) connotes condemnation.

ILOVE debating with the pathetically-ignorant. It give me a chance to teach . . . First of all, Einstein - the Pope didn't "change" any teaching on Limbo. This was never a matter of doctrine in the first place. It was simply a way of trying to reason the fate of unbaptized babies, since...

The post YOU were responding to was about Purgatory. If you've runt OUT of gas on the subject - just say so . . .

Yes – MORE alive because they are in the presence of Alnighty God and their will is in perfect line with His. A arrogant as YOU are – YOU ain’t there yet. Well . . . BYE. Show me where Scripture ever refers to the “Incarnation” Show me where Scripture ever refers to the “Trinity” Show me...

What does this hve to do with Purgatory - which is the TOPIC we were discussing??

So, you couldn't actually REFUTE anything I wrote. That's what I thought . . .

I ALREADY laid out the Scriptural case for Purgatory in posts #7834 and #7850. All I've gotten from YOU guys are a litany of denials - but no Scriptural refutation . . .

I suggest you READ post #7929 to find out WHO declared those Books "uninspired".

Alright – they are MORE perfect that you and MORE alive than you. Suuuurrrre . . . That’s why ALL I get from you are stupid denials when I plaster Scriptural proof in front of you. And that is the GENERAL Judgement – not the Particular Judgement. If it’s NOT true – then when WHY do you...

WHO said that Matt. 25:34-40 was about Purgatory?? Pat attention: We were talking about the JUDGEMENT of believers.

Well, the mere fact that the very Books that Jesus Himself studied from and considered "Scripture" are being referred to as "Satanic Books" on this form speaks VOLUMES about the many renegade opinions within Protestantism. I would NOT want to be in the position of telling God that His Books are...

Ther was quite a rant . . . What I gleaned from it is that YOU are among the “Lone Ranger” believers who reject the Church- and just about every assemblage of believers. This is patently ANTI-Scriptural, as we are admonished to NOT forsake the assembly (Heb. 10:25). Like I said before – I do...