Search results

Then YOU Protestants have a problem, don't 'cha? Because . . . Some Protestant factions believe in baptismal regeneration, while others do not. Some believe in soul-sleep, while others do not. Some believe in the total depravity of man, while others do not. Some believe in the Holy Trinity...

Yes - that's a relatively NEW cop-out on the anti-Catholic circuits. Ignorant anti-Catholics like YOU used to claim it WAS the Whore of Babylon - until you were publicly humiliated by posts like mike. THEN, you guys switched to, "PART of Mystery Babylon".. Nive try, sparky - but the Bible...

Luther, Calvin, Zwingili, Knox, et all - ALL have different doctrines that they invented. ALL of those doctrines are Protestant doctrines - regardless of WHO invented them. NOT that difficult to understand . . .

You're embarrassing yourself again . . . The Bible states the following about the Whore: 1. She "sits on 7 HILLS" (Rev. 17:9) - Vatican Hill is NOT one of the 7 hills of Rome: Aventine Hill, Caelian Hill, Capitoline Hill, Esquiline Hill, Palatine Hill, Quirinal Hill, Viminal Hill - Jerusalem...

WRONG. I simply referred to it as a Protestant doctrine - which is IS. Not too bright - are ya?

Just DID. Uh-huh, along with Scripture, history, etymological facts, etc . . .

Calvinists aren't the only ones who believe in Eternal Security, Einstein. Not to mention the fact that Calvinists ARE Protestants. Good grief . . .

Time for a language lesson, son . . . The context here is recognizing a person’s “fruit”. In one passage, the fruit represents words and thoughts. In the 2nd passage, the fruit is one’s actions. SAME context – different situations, Einstein. . Nope. It means that you guys haven’t even been...

This passage clearly uses the word “Epignosis” in reference to who ios it talking about – which is only used about a DOZEN times in the NT. As I explained before – this word connotes a full, experiential and relational knowledge – not unlike marriage. ONLY born again believers can have an...

This is NOT a “separate” event from 2 Thess. 4:13-18. It is the FINAL Judgement where ALL will be judged. It includes ALL of those who have died – and ALL of those who are alive at Christ’s return.

TRANSLATION: “I cannot defend my position . . .” Yes, I figured that.

Heb. 11:35 references TWO DIFFERENT events, Einstein. Pail is listing events and people from the Old Testament: Heb. 11:32-35 And what more shall I say? I do not have time to tell about Gideon, Barak, Samson and Jephthah, about David and Samuel and the prophets, 33 who through faith conquered...

Then, why is there no cross-reference to 1 Kings 10 in Matt. 12:42? And I presented FOUR examples . . .

Exactly. And this makes the Protestant doctrine of “Eternal Security” conditional and NOT absolute.

HUH?? The CONTXT is the same. The SUBJECT is not. Learn the difference, Einstein . . . In other words – you’re stumped and can’t argue your way out of the other 2 examples. Got it.

Yes - and God will NOT cast away any of His people. WHO are “His people”?? Those who DO His will (Matt. 7:21). “His people” do not include those who only pay lip service by professing belief in Him yet do not do His will. NOR does they include those who were once faithful and later fell away...

WHO said that "fruit" has to pertain to the same things in both instances?? It's not a fulfillment of a prophecy - but a mere figure of speech, Einistin. Ummmm, I believe I gave you THREE other examples . . .

The Judgement described in Matt. 25 I is for the ENTIRETY of mankind – living and dead. When He “comes in glory” pertains to the Resurrection of the dead: 2 Thess. 4:13-18 For the Lord himself will come down from heaven, with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet...

That's just it - there ARE none. There are no verses that give you license to do whatever you wan and STILL be saved. In contest - ALL of those verses you're talking about are conditional. For example - Rom. 11:22 - “IF you continue in His goodness” Heb. 10:23 - Let us hold fast the...

Sure I do. "You all" is ANY ignorant anti-Catholic I come in contact with. It doesn't pertain to ALL Protestants . . . My job is simple - to seek out lies about Catholics and destroy them publicly. Just think of me as the "Ignorance Terminator". In any case - I've certainly ruffled YOUR...