Search results

You can see that there is nothing personal within it. It is a declaration which is found in all wills and testaments. What does yours say?

You still refuse to recognize that a New Will and Testament completely revokes and replaces an old will and testament. Recently I asked you to quote verbatim the Revocation section of your own will and testament. You didn't. I'm awaiting that.

You've still got it wrong, bro. The promises are testamentary clauses in a Will and Testament, and a New Will and Testament completely replaces an old will and testament. Thus, all of the promises of God are fulfilled in Christ (2 Corinthians 1:20; Galatians 3:16; and a whole bunch of...

The verse physically (literally) says that there would be hostility between snakelets and children. The verse spiritually says that there would be hostility between Satan and Christ, even though neither is literally mentioned. Which message do you think God was seeking to convey?

Scripture's first prophecy: Genesis 3:15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel. Is it physical, or is it spiritual?

Provide just one name of any recognized defender of the true faith between the 1st and 18th centuries who claimed, as you do, that the New Covenant had not gone into effect. Just one name. You believe that Jesus extended to His disciples a New Covenant which you deny had gone into effect. It...

Quote the forum rule which says "This forum is not about one's personal relationship with God." I've cited the following. Is it righteousness created by God? Is it "no Scriptural truth"? Is it "filthy rags"? 1 Corinthians 1:30 But of him are ye in Christ Jesus, who of God is made unto us...

Righteousness in general is the sum total of righteousnesses in individuals. I say that based on your claims, you do not have righteousness. You've said nothing to suggest otherwise. If you can read your own post at any time, then why don't you?

Excerpt from your post #260: " Peter is waiting for this: "Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision...

Are you saying that you do have righteousness?

Why do you not have righteousness?

You define "dispen/premil's scripture" as Scripture. I don't.

I see you have no righteousness.

You keep ignoring "dispen/premil's scripture", which is not Scripture.

You are waiting for it. Peter was not waiting for it. Christ was not waiting for it. None of the New Testament writers were waiting for it. No cognizant New Covenant Child of God has ever been waiting for it. Lots of righteousness was reigning already 2,000 years ago. Nobody was waiting...

Mocking dispen/premil's scripture.

Why would anyone acknowledge a figment of dispen/premil hallucination?

No prob.

Notifications, i.e. alerts, can be received for posts which a person has not originated, if said person is active in the thread. In post 229 you erroneously believed that a post of mine had been directed to you, when in fact it had been directed to "Truth7t7".

The faithful obedient remnant Israelites in Christ under His New Covenant are comprised of both Jews and Gentiles, just as the faithful obedient remnant Israelites in God under His Old Covenant were also comprised of both Jews and Gentiles. Genesis 17:12 And he that is eight days old shall be...