Search results

You know who they are (unless your thumb up was a mistake). They're not who dispen/premil says they are.

Amens, brother. Dispen/premil's spectacle of 144,000 sex-starved Jews roaming the planet attempting evangelism is beyond risible. Thanks for your discerning spiritual insights.

What did you say is the name of your cult? Does the Church now know more about the New Covenant than Jesus knew when extended it to His disciples? Matthew 26:28. You've claimed that the New Covenant is incomplete. So you believe that Jesus extended an incomplete New Covenant to His...

There's no evading the logic and its reality, which you have failed to address. If there were no Jews accepting Christ and being added to His Church, then there would be no dispensational replacement theology, because the Church would not be replacing Israel. The unavoidable conclusion is...

Obviously not, since John 6:27 has nothing to do with Jews or 144,000. If you think that the Blue Letter Bible says that it does, then provide a link to confirm your claim.

Do whatever you want to feel however you want, and stop hallucinating about mockery.

According to the dispensational definition of Replacement Theology, Every Jew who receives Christ and is added to His Church, is an example of Replacement Theology. Because in every such instance, the Church has replaced Israel. If there were no Jews receiving Christ and being added to His...

Two Israels. Romans 9 6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh...

On whom does the Blue Letter Bible tell you God has set His seal, in John 6:27? Link, please.

You haven't answered the question. And you have not yet provided the previously requested historical orthodox Christian support for your claims.

I've presented considerable Scripture. You've presented none. So "It is not Scripture" is you describing your own posts. Who is forcing you to feel good? Not I. I've already told you that the last thing I'd want would be to force you to feel good. So stop feeling good. Provide an example...

John 6:27 has nothing to do with either the 144,000 or with Jews. "Him" refers to "the Son of Man" on Whom God has set His seal, thus both are capitalized in the NASB below. John 6:27 NASB Do not work for the food that perishes, but for the food that lasts for eternal life, which the Son of...

Then why are they not in their own individual testaments rather than combined under a single Testament? They are fully analogous to the testamentary/promissory statements and clauses, spelling out the bequests for heirs, which have characterized Wills and Testaments for millennia. They get the...

How about Scripture instead of nothing more than your opinions? The last thing I'd want would be for you to feel good. If you have Scripture disproving the Scripture that I've presented, then please present yours.

John 6 27 Labour not for the meat which perisheth, but for that meat which endureth unto everlasting life, which the Son of man shall give unto you: for him hath God the Father sealed. It is the Son of man whom God has sealed. Nothing to do with Jews. There is no destiny for anyone, Israeli...

The promises to Abraham, David, et al, are promissory clauses of the Old Testament, not separate testaments themselves. If the New Testament applied only to the law, then there would be multiple other New Testaments applying specifically to the Abrahamic, Davidic, et al, promises. But there...

Here is a description of the 144,000 which extols Christ, His Church, and His Great Salvation through the ages. Immeasurably more grand and glorious than a crew of sex-starved Jews. The Church and the 144,000 Revelation 7:3-4 describe the 144,000 as “sealed.” That description is reserved in...

Again: Do you think that God broke His promises when His Son took away the old promises to establish the New and Better Promises? Hebrews 8:6. It appears that you do.

For national Israel? You know better than that.

Not one from the NT, which I'd requested.