Search results

I don't respond to gibberish.

Thanks for confirmation that a papist has no idea what the Lord's Supper is.

Matthew 26 26 And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, blessed and broke it, and gave it to the disciples and said, “Take, eat; this is My body.” 27 Then He took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, “Drink from it, all of you. 28 For this is My blood of the new covenant...

Where in Scripture is the Lord's Supper identified as a wedding feast?

Of course. He tells us that He is the One of Whom the inspired Scriptures speak. Not the uninspired edicts of a church.

Who do you think is "me"?

Had Ignatius forgotten the name of the active pope/bishop of Rome when he wrote his letter? He must have had a very poor memory. Perhaps you can enlighten us (but I doubt it). Who was the active pope/bishop of Rome when Ignatius wrote his letter? When did Ignatius ever mention the name of...

I advised you not to look like a fool. You failed. I said that Wycliffe was one of the earliest to declare the papacy to be antichrist. You shot your mouth off in post 822 attempting to claim that Tertullian preceded him in that declaration. I requested a verbatim quote, which of course you...

There were no dispen futurists 1,000 years ago.

Post the verbatim excerpt from the treatise in which Tertullian explicitly refers to the papacy as antichrist. Take your time. Try not to look like a fool.

If Ignatius had been an institutional Catholic as you claim, he would not have neglected to mention the pope in his letter. He never mentions the pope. He was not the institutional Catholic that you claim. He was not an institutional Catholic at all.

Better call up your folks for a verbal thrashing. PS. Ever hear of a spell checker?

Thanks for the guffaws. John Wycliffe's global influence in the dissemination of the Gospel, imperfect though he may have been, is unequalled, and has endured over the centuries to this very moment in time; and will continue to do so, through ministries such as the Wycliffe Bible Translators...

If he was Marianized, why did your apostate papacy exhume and burn his bones? Answer: Because he was one of the earliest to accurately recognize and proclaim the apostate papacy as antichrist. You've proved nothing except that the Douay-Rheims did not appear until almost two centuries after...

He was one of the Church of God that we see in Scripture. He was not a Catholic. The institutionalized RC church did not begin to appear until the 4th century at the earliest. He cannot be contorted into one.

You said "celebrate". I didn't.

John Wycliffe's English Bible was published in 1388, almost two centuries before the Douay-Rheims. Wycliffe is recognized by true Protestants as the Morning Star of the Reformation. In a compelling demonstration of intelligence and conduct, the apostate papacy exhumed and burned his bones...

Origen beat you to it, identifying the NT canon a century before Rome did. Origen circa 250 AD: But when our Lord Jesus Christ comes, whose arrival that prior son of Nun designated, he sends priests, his apostles, bearing “trumpets hammered thin,” the magnificent and heavenly instruction of...

You said "assassinations". I didn't. If it's irrelevant, why did you include it? What have you got against spaghetti?

This is typical risible heretical RC eisegesis. Locate a Scripture which can be wildly extrapolated, and then attempt to use it to support RC false dogma. Matthew 18:17-18 deals with church discipline. It in no way cedes Scriptural authority to the church. Notwithstanding the obvious, for...