Search results

Thanks for confirming the point. Of course everybody uses metaphors. Ignatius was one of "everybody", and he used the metaphors I cited e.g. fire and water. And bread, flesh, wine, and blood.

At what point in the digestive process do the bread and wine become flesh and blood? With supporting medical evidence. You're not merely quiet. You're deafeningly silent.

Ignatius was notable for his use of extensive metaphorization in his writing. In his Letter to the Romans, Chapter 7, he wrote: "My passionate love has been crucified and there is no fire of material longing within me, but only water living and speaking in me, saying within me, ‘Come to the...

Who in the post-apostolic church before the 10th century espoused transubstantiation? Link to verbatim quote, please.

He's unable to explain why Matthew did not, in the Greek, render Matthew 16:18 as "Petros/Petros", which would have reflected Aramaic's singular rendering. But Matthew didn't. He rendered the Greek as "Petros/Petra". Because the Holy Spirit inspired him to clearly highlight the distinction...

You've been flattened by the Spirit's Scriptural Steamroller. Thanks for the entertainment.

If the Aramaic singular rendering was the applicable rendering, then we would see that reflected in at least one Greek manuscript as "Petros/Petros". We do not. Thank you for confirming that "Petros/Petra" was and is the Holy Spirit's inspired rendering. End of story.

Either you enjoy acting the fool, or you're so hopelessly indoctrinated in papist ideology that you're unable to engage in rational dialogue. I didn't ask for your illogical and irrelevant opinions. I asked a simple question. I'll further clarify it to conform to your stricture: There is a...

It makes perfect sense grammatically. Apparently it doesn't make sense to you cognitively. Or is that because you have no answer for it? Here it is again. What don't you understand? There is a plethora of Greek manuscripts of the Gospel of Matthew. What is the earliest such manuscript...

Closet papistry.

Closet papistry.

Closet papistry.

Historicism precedes both Alcazar and Ribera. Their objective was to eliminate it. They failed. Historicism rejects both Alcazar's preterism and Ribera's futurism, whose objectives were to sabotage the Reformation. They failed. Dispensational futurism, whose bed you are in, adores and...

Present your evidence, if you can find any. Are you interested in getting banned from this forum? Your language can ensure that, if you wish.

Reality can be destructive. The ten horns were ten Roman kingdoms resulting from the dissolution of the 4th kingdom, Imperial Rome. The little horn was a Roman kingdom which overthrew three of the ten. Lots of Rome there. All in the historical record.

Here are two: Daniel 7 24And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings. 25And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the...

The papal claims are unmistakable indefensible blasphemies. Why would you defend them? A vicar is a substitute. The prefix "anti" also means substitute, as in antichrist. These were Reformation foundational doctrines. By God's grace and mercy, the Reformation liberated the True Church from...

Isaiah 9:6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. Not a representative. Rather, a counterfeit substitute. All the...

I don't understand what a "Codez" is. Neither do you. Of course. And why did the original manuscript say "Petros/Petra", rather than "Petra/Petra" or "Petros/Petros"? Because the Holy Spirit inspired it as "Petros/Petra". Are you still denying the Holy Spirit inspiration of that Scripture...

AKA Dispensational Delusional Dogma.