Search results

Just look at the number of young people who aren't students who do the same thing!

Nah, I can vitricise 7 days a week! I'm on record. :p:p:p .

Aw, come on, GE. We're still pals, aren't we? I mean, after all, we went to two different schools together! .

A picture of Jesus and His commandments—that's all it takes for you to blow a gasket. Bring on your two-faced, Adventist-backstabbing, GE. I'm used to it by now. Bless one post; curse the next. It's pretty predictable. Jesus was NOT resurrected on the Sabbath and to make such a schismatic...

I concede your points: 1. You don't know if I agree with your side of the hypothetical situation. 2. You don't know if I consider you a brother or not. I have failed miserably to successfully make these things clear. Brother .

Sidestepping the substitution of one commandment for another. These things ought ye to have done, and not left the other undone. I do not say it was your idea, but your tradition, by which you have made the commandment of God of none effect. Is flippancy in order? Paul was called to be...

The King of the universe summoned the heavenly hosts before Him, that in their presence He might set forth the true position of His Son and show the relation He sustained to all created beings. The Son of God shared the Father's throne, and the glory of the eternal, self-existent One encircled...

The Big Picture:

Then you are, in your own eyes, and by your own admission, at perfect liberty to set aside the commandment of God by your tradition. Daniel is testified to have prayed 3 times daily as a matter of habit. I wonder if he made the commandment of God of none effect. Nowhere is is it specifically...

The question is not of which day the LORD made or when we should pray. Those matters are settled. The question is: Which, of all the days He made, did He bless, sanctify or set apart, and command to be kept holy, as it was made holy, by Him.

The problem is, when the time comes the wills of those who would persecute will have already been surrendered.

I concede your points: 1. You don't know if I agree with your side of the hypothetical situation. 2. You don't know if I consider you a brother or not. I have failed miserably to successfully make these things clear. Brother .

1. edjkcr3cr;3ociubrbciirjfc3piuphrhfcccjncpj4rcp;uc4picihpch 2. e3dkj3enccpo3oiico;rccui5rbcp5urch[coiiciriu3bcoixncniufn3ff3uilfbului3ff Isn't this about where we are? .

So you can summarily vomit all over and dismissively and arbitrarily disqualify them? I think not. It was dark outside when I was born, but it was't last night, Robert. Asked and answered You have a very conspicuous way of talking past points you can't actually refute. I'm...

You say that "we people" are separating ourselves from you (something we've never even hinted at) and, in the very next utterance, make a distinctly declarative statement of separating yourself from us!!! ¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿ And then, from out of nowhere, comes this: To what is...

And just like that... We're Romanists.

Distinction without a difference "You people.." The last cry of the persecutor "They are they which testify of ME." Still looking for some expression of worship in the Spirit (besides trumpeting) from the one accusing other brethren of having none... .

This is what you call an argument from silence that isn't really even silence, considering the scriptures the apostles learned and taught from were the Old Testament. I could just as easily counter that if Sabbath-keeping and breaking was an issue in the time of the apostles we would have heard...

You are obviously under the assumption that I make my manner of keeping the Sabbath criteria for others. I know that there are conscientious persons who do certain work that is necessary to preserve and sustain the health and life of God's creatures on the Sabbath. Some of them turn over any...