Search results

We see Stephen addressing Isaiah 66:1, whilst preaching on the subject of the tabernacle in Acts 7:44-50, saying, “Our fathers had the tabernacle of witness in the wilderness, as he had appointed, speaking unto Moses, that he should make it according to the fashion that he had seen. Which also...

Premils do not seem to know what it means to be "in Christ." They do not know who that applies to. No wonder their theology is messed up.

It says all flesh are destroyed. Hello! Premils prove time after time that they do not take Scripture literal. They literalize the spiritual language and spiritualize the literal language. There are 2 camps in Revelation (as elsewhere in Scripture) - 2 armies, saved and lost.

The text couldn't be clearer: "of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne [referring to Psalms 132:12]; he seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ." Sorry for bursting your bubble, but, this doesn't allow for any Premil...

What you quote as evidence for your imaginary future kingdom is just a mere question from the disciples. That is it! For the record, the disciples said a lot and asked a lot that was fool-hearty that Jesus had to correct or rebuke. He did so here. But you totally reject His teaching. You defer...

Once again you ignore a lengthy post, and a wealth of evidence, that forbids your teaching and respond with a mistaken evasive response. I refer you back. You sidestep a solid of rebuttal. This is the normal Premil mode of engagement.

No. There is no division in the body after the First Advent. The message is to the redeemed irrespective of race. Your apparteite theology runs contrary to the teaching of the NT.

Lol, your evidence is your opinion. The wording of the text means nothing to you. The two verses that go before Acts 1:6 (relating to the disciples’ question) support the idea of a spiritual kingdom. The two verses that follow Acts 1:6 (relating to the disciples’ question) show the Lord giving...

1 Corinthians 15:21-26 declares: “For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ's at his coming. Then cometh the...

You have no idea when the last days occur, when they started and when they finish, what they relate to and what happens in them. This is 101 Christianity. A future millennium is not the beginning of the last days. The earthly ministry of Christ is. The last days are now and the last day is the...

There is no mortals left to populate your supposed future millennium. Revelation 10:5-7 says of the Second Advent and the concluding last trumpet, “And the angel which I saw stand upon the sea and upon the earth lifted up his hand to heaven, and sware by him that liveth for ever and ever, who...

Regardless of how you dress it up, the text forbids your doctrine. This is another evidence (of countless) of how Premil butchers the Word of God to say the opposite to what it says, in order to sustain its false teaching. This is another reason for Premils to abandon Premil. There is so much...

There is the ascent of the spirit to glory upon death and the body later. You are not seeing that.

The text tells us: David has been reigning on David's throne since the resurrection. He has the key of David now. Your fight is with the Book. Not Amils. This why every reader should reject Premil. It butchers the Word of God.

How can you reason with such a person?

Hades. You knew what i meant.

True Israel - God's elect of all nations.

You are now denying the cross-work. Wow! You are denying Christ’s new covenant has already been introduced. Premil is letting it's mask fall. This is utter heresy. That is why it desires another temple, priesthood and blood sacrifices.

After.

Lol. Okay, you have nothing then. I get it.