Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. W

    Indisputable proof that the Premillennial theory contradicts Scripture

    Heaven. Nowhere does it say Hades. That is your own personal invention.
  2. W

    Surely Premils must invent 2 future glorifications days and 2 future raptures separated by 1000 years+?

    The word rule should be interpreted "shepherd." It describes the separation of the sheep and the goats at the end
  3. W

    Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would fight, so a 1000 yr reign on this earth is false

    Maybe you would do a comparison between Zechariah 14 and Revelation 20 and show us the correlation. I will not hold my breath. This is a forced interpretation. Your interpretation is in error. The new covenant took us out of the Old. You can promote the rebuilding of a new temple and the...
  4. W

    Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would fight, so a 1000 yr reign on this earth is false

    Seriously? You need to (1) move out of the OT and move into the NT and (2) take off your Premil glasses and you will quickly see we are a holy priesthood, we are kings and priests now.
  5. W

    Indisputable proof that the Premillennial theory contradicts Scripture

    You are not getting it are you? You have addressed nothing. You are papering over the evidence before you. Paradise is what i said it was, not what you have been taught. Can you see the folly of your error? You have zero Scripture. It is all invented imaginations in your head. That sums up...
  6. W

    Surely Premils must invent 2 future glorifications days and 2 future raptures separated by 1000 years+?

    That is where Premil has arrived. That is normal today. Why can none of them be orthodox?
  7. W

    Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would fight, so a 1000 yr reign on this earth is false

    Lol. Are your eyes painted on? This has already occurred at the resurrection. There is no room for Premils to twist it. It is crystal clear.
  8. W

    Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would fight, so a 1000 yr reign on this earth is false

    Death is eliminated when Jesus comes. So will sin and sinners. Let us have a literal word-by-word look at the Hebrew pertaining to Isaiah 65:20. לֹא־יִֽהְיֶ֨ה מִשָּׁ֜ם עֹ֗וד ע֤וּל יָמִים֙ וְזָקֵ֔ן אֲשֶׁ֥ר Lo'- yihªyeh mishaam `owd `uwl yaamiym wªzaaqeen 'ªsher Not be hence more an infant [of]...
  9. W

    Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would fight, so a 1000 yr reign on this earth is false

    So, the blood of Christ is not enough for sinners to cleanse, forgive and sanctify. Sorry. That is heresy.
  10. W

    Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would fight, so a 1000 yr reign on this earth is false

    BREAKING NEWS: The old covenant is gone forever. It is abolished in full. The redeemed belong to the new covenant. Christians are a spiritual priesthood today.
  11. W

    Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would fight, so a 1000 yr reign on this earth is false

    Peter disagrees with you in Acts 2:29-36, saying: “Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulchre is with us unto this day. Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit...
  12. W

    Indisputable proof that the Premillennial theory contradicts Scripture

    The whole basis of your argument is built upon sand. You force your opinion upon the sacred text. Nowhere in Luke 16:19-31 does it say Abraham's bosom is paradise. Quite the opposite. The reader can see for themselves that this is your own invention. Everything after this extra-biblical claim is...
  13. W

    Surely Premils must invent 2 future glorifications days and 2 future raptures separated by 1000 years+?

    OP Note Note how no Premil has been able to lay a punch upon this Op. Why? Because it exposes the contradictions that attach itself to Premil. It is a non-corroborative doctrine. It enjoys no other biblical support. This is witnessed in the fact that Premils have to steal passages that apply to...
  14. W

    Why do Premillennialists not believe that 1 Thessalonians 5:2-3 and 2 Peter 3:10-13 refer to the same event?

    We have not replaced anyone. We have been grafted into true believing elect Israel (the remnant of God).
  15. W

    Why do Premillennialists not believe that 1 Thessalonians 5:2-3 and 2 Peter 3:10-13 refer to the same event?

    No! You made the false allegation that we believed in Replacement Theology. We questioned that. The burden of proof is with you to prove what you are alleging. So far you have presented nothing. That sums up your argument. Nothing!
  16. W

    Surely Premils must invent 2 future glorifications days and 2 future raptures separated by 1000 years+?

    You have been unable to highlight one single error in Amil. If you had it you would present it. But you have nothing. You are playing evasive games because you have nothing. Your doctrine has been totally exposed on here. That is why no Premil can actually address the Op of any Amil thread. It...
  17. W

    Surely Premils must invent 2 future glorifications days and 2 future raptures separated by 1000 years+?

    I gave you a direct word for word translation. You wanted to be difficult and ignore that and home in on the paraphrase, which was not the foundation of my argument. It was there for all to see. This is called nitpicking.