Search results

That's funny coming from YOU - one of the most perverted FALSE teachrs on this forum. You decry the "evils" of the Catholic Church on just about every thread - ywt you CANNOT answer the ONE question I've been asking you for about 6 months now: If the Catholic Church ius "Evil" - WHY do YOU...

For about the 100th time now on thhis thread - I will regurgitsate the following linguistic fact: MANY words in Aramaic CANNOT be directly translated into Greek - and vice versa. This is true for EVERY language on the planet. Greek employes masculine and feminie nouns and vers - as does...

That's RICH, coming from a person wjo REJECTS on of the most important and CORE doctriines of the Early Church - the Holy Eucharist. Matt. 10:33 ". . . but whoever denies me before men, I WILL DENYBEFORE MY FATHER WHO IS IN HEAVEN.." Good luck with that . . .

There are TWO main reasons why: Ignorance and the rejection of Christ's Church. In order to follow the prideful ways and invented doctrinesof the Protestant Revolk - you have to put ALL of your trust in MEN, instead of God . . .

Why it it that anti Catholics can NEVER stay on track? Point me to a SINGLE post where I made the claim that the entire NT was written in Arqamaic. In post #628, I made this emphatic statement: First of all - I NEVER stated that the NT was written in Aramaic.so I don’t know WHY you’re asking...

THANK YOU for illustrating your complete failure to actually address these point by instead pointing to 2 obvious TYPOS . . . FIRST of all - your last question doesn't make sense grammatically. Secondly - Greek is NOT som kind of "holy language" that God ordained for the Scrptureds. It was...

There you go again arguing for the Greek – when they DIDN’T even speak it to each other. If you’re NOT going to address the reality of the Aramaic – then your argument is moot. You keep deflecting and basing your entire argument on the Greek – when they SPOKE in Aramaic. This is the...

First of all - I NEVER stated that the NT was written in Aramaic.so I don’t know WHY you’re asking. HOWEVER, the Gospel of Matthew was purportedly originally written in Hebrew/Aramaic and THEN copies int Greek, according to 2nd century Church Fathers,  Papias of Hierapolis and Irenaeus of...

Actually, you haven't. You provided some textbook definitions of words colored by your OWN opinion. The evidence I provided wasn't MY opinion - but those of twelve Greek/Scripture scholars. Besides , in order to "debunk" that Peter was in charge - YOU need to address the following Scriptural...

Even Paul refers to Peter as "Cephas" in his letters because it is a Greek transliteration for the Aramaic, "Kepha" (Rock).

Care yo explain WHY you "disagree" with me with regard to the fact that Aramaic doesn't differentiate between rocks? I'd love to hear your explanation.

"Selective"? They're 12 random Protestant sources who ALL make the argument that the "Rock" is Peter. How many would I need to provide before you change your mind? WHICH Protestant sources are correct?? And I wasan't referrig to YOU personally as an anti-Catholic - I was simply making a...

Since you obviously haven't actually read ANY of the evidence I've presented on this argument – Please read my last post - #617. This does NOT take away from the fact that Jesus is the ROCK of our salvation. He is repeatedly referred to as “Rock” and “Cornerstone” in Scripture. HOWEVEVER –...

This is a non sequitur. I wassn't making a case for the Vulgate - but for the fact that Jesus and His Apostels souke ARAMAIC - not Greek. This single fact DESTROYS the notion that Jesus referred to Simon as a "Little Stone". In Aramaic, the word "Kepha" means nothing elkse but "ROCK". There is...

REALLY?? What's wrong with you? The Codex was COPIED DOWN from the original GREEK language -AS GREEK not some other language. Do you even understand WHAT a "Codez" is?? A codex is titten in BOOK for instead of SCROLLS. The Codex Vaticanus is the GREEK Bible copied down from the scrolls into...

I haven't used a single exclamation point, so I don't know what you're talking about . . . Why?? I’m NOT the one who is confused here. This is how stupid your argument is: - I explain to you that the NT was written in GREEK – but Jesus and the Apostles spoke ARAMAIC to one another. - I further...

And only LIARS tell lies . . . Here is what the inerrant Word of Almighty God states: The THREE people mentioned in the Bible who are called “The Rock” are: - Jesus (Matt. 21:42, Luke 20:17, Acts 4:11.) - Abraham (Isa. 51:1-2) - Peter (Matt. 16:18) By the way - there is s dire warning for ALL...

I cannot imagine that you spend time on a discussion forum - yet you can’t seem to follow the discussion. NOBODY stated that Christ WASN’T the Rock. He’s just not the Rock of Matt. 16:18 – Peter is. - Jesus is the Rock of many verses, including Matt. 21:42, Luke 20:17, Acts 4:11. - Abraham is...

And THAT’S your response?? It’s utterly astounding to me that so many of you anti-Catholics live on such a voracious diet of denial, subterfuge and rejection. I presented a rock-solid linguistic and Biblical case for Matt. 16:18, and you guys come back with this drivel because your cannot find...

What a moronic response. You remind me of these guys – who refuse to See, hear or repeat. Simple-minded denials will NIOT make the truth “vanish”. I’ve presented an air-tight case about Peter being the “Rock” of Matt. 16. and I included at leats a DOZEN of the most respected Protestant...