Search results

Is the beast going to reign for just one hour at the end?

This has been explained to you a thousand times (figuratively). Scripture repeatedly uses prison, chains and bondage in a figurative sense. It is identified with the spiritual bondage of the unregenerate. The chains that were on the Gentiles before the cross have now been placed on the devil...

You're getting more and more desperate and vicious with your comments. You're obviously frustrated because you've got no corroboration for your opinion of Revelation 20. What is more, you have no rebuttal for Amillennialism.

It means a long time. It is a book full of symbolism. Do you really believe the devil has got seven heads? Of course not. Do you believe that antichrist is only going to reign for one hour at the end? Of course not.

This doesn't make sense to me. I don't know what you're trying to say. But Revelation 20 relates to the intra-advent.

I do not agree. You're fighting with Scripture here. There can only be one first resurrection. It happened 2000 years ago. This alone disallows your thesis. What is more, you have zero corroboration teaching that there is a large amount of time between the resurrection of the righteous and the...

The beast has been around since the beginning. He is not a person. He is the evil demonic executor of the devil. He was defeated at the cross, and has been restrained in his ability until recently. The abyss is not a physical geographical prison. It is a spiritual prison. I believe Satan, the...

The beast arises in Satan's little season at the end of Revelation 20. You need to compare Scripture with Scripture. If you do, you will see that.

The Bible makes it clear that Christ is "the first resurrection" (Acts 26:23 and Revelation 20:6), "the firstborn from the dead" (Colossians 1:18), "the firstfruits of them that slept" (1 Corinthians 15:20), "first begotten of the dead" (Revelation 1:5).

You are playing word games to allow Premil. The whole of Scripture depicts the coming of the Lord as climatic. Revelation is the last of seven recaps in that book. This like countless other Scripture shows the last day to be the last day. Jesus explains in John 5:28-29, “Marvel not at this...

Regardless, deception is written all over that.

Excellent question. Sadly, for Premils it is often the vaguer OT.

I though you were ignoring me? Can you not keep your word? This above is typical of you manipulating Scripture to support what you have been taught.

The theological manipulation that Premil requires is breathtaking. Your words above are another reason to reject Premil.

Clear to the undoctrinated.

If you built your argument on opinions they would be able to find holes.

Matthew 12:22-29 records, “Then was brought unto him one possessed with a devil, blind, and dumb: and he healed him, insomuch that the blind and dumb both spake and saw. And all the people were amazed, and said, Is not this the son of David? But when the Pharisees heard it, they said, This...

Reading your posts and trying to assess your evidence leads us to just your opinions. That is the grounds of your argument. You have nothing else. It seems like you think if you state an opinion that makes it a fact. That is not the way it works. You do not seem to have any concept of Amil.

The reason they cannot take this literal is because it forbids Premil.

So, what do you do with Ez 40-47? Is it a literal temple with literal sacrifices in your future millennium?