Search results

There may be more of a biblical connection than I have yet realized. But no, my experience was one of a personal nature of personally being chosen--not as the best, but as the least.

That is a good explanation of what learned men have come to believe, and yet it does not touch upon the full glory of God whom is spirit. And no, God is not a god of chaos but of order. Even so, He did "confuse" all language at Babel, wherein men labor and study mostly to fail in their efforts...

If you yourself have a vision of a place, a world-- what is it? It is a vision, or rather in the case of mankind and the universe made of the same elements--as it is written, mankind is made an "image." The point of God stating first that the heavens and the earth were without form and void...

Again, I have answered your questions already. So much so, that you show a lack of comprehension. But it's more than that, isn't it? The problem is, you don't understand how this works...and it irritates you, obviously. Which is your own fault. How is it that you do not know that the word from...

Not true. On the contrary, it is written, we are to be One in Christ with Him who is spirit.

I gave you what you came looking for, sometimes nothing, but not withholding.

As I said, you wouldn't know. But, no, I am not saying I completely understand the scriptures--God does. But I do understand my part as it is given to me. No, the seventh angel has not yet sounded.

Without giving witness to myself, of those things which are written: I am one of three, two are dead and I remain; was caught up to the third heaven, returned and tasked by God; endured training and waiting for nearly forty years before what was given to me in silence was then revealed in the...

Your ignorance and arrogance (and timing) is not unlike that of the Pharisees during Jesus' first advent. By your logic, Jesus', Peter's, Paul's, and John's warnings and prophecies are wrong, and the church is correct. And you are now not even listening, misquoting me, and even accusing like...

It did not become "broken down, void and without form", but was without form at first before man was created.

There is both good and bad to letting your mind wander into every possibility. The focus of this thread is the specific issue of the finish of Christ revealing all as foretold by Daniel and John, as being sealed until now. Matthew 6:34 simply shows a reason for looking at this specific time...

I have explained already, that Genesis 1:1-2 have not been read, looked at, or considered the way it actually reads. But the reason for bringing it up now, and why Jesus did not say more 2,000 years ago, is because there are specific revelations that are written as being sealed until just...

You are wrong, as I have explained already. No--that is not my claim. "Finished" (as Jesus said), does not mean "God wants nothing more to do with the nation of Israel." Again, I have explained already. Your understanding (which is also most common among the church) is in accord with the...

This is why: Matthew 6:34 Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about its own things. Sufficient for the day is its own trouble. Because, today, is that "tomorrow" Jesus spoke of. The great unveiling of Christ has come already, but He spoke in preparation of our time...

I have been elaborating the specific occurrence of the final revelations from God to come just before the end of time, noted as sealed by Daniel and by John. Doing so in the form of warning, the warnings of which were missed and put off by false teachers and their victims since and before the...

We're just looking at two different aspects of the same unveiling. This thread is not really about the general and greater unveiling by Christ, but was intended to bring specific attention to the revelations from God stated by Daniel and by John, not to be revealed until just before the end of...

You know nothing of the sort. I answered you already.

This may be the crux of the problem with our communication. Yes--we are the children of Adam and Eve and original sin, after their kind, meaning dead to God. Which is not so nicely stated as we "need to be made alive by faith"--because that does not fully state the fact that we must literally...

The contradiction is not mine, but is between that born of the flesh and that born of the Spirit. Which, if you do not rightly divide we have no communion with which to communicate all that is true...because I have rightly divided it, and still you think it mystical or worse.

So...you are saying Jesus never said things like "unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in you?" Check!