Search results

We are born into a world--this world of time, and because of it time is the rule we come to live by. Rightly so. However, that is not the reality that defines our God, and as it turns out time is simply a teaching tool. Just as we have increments and years of school, time is God's way of...

That is a fair, but perhaps confusing, assessment. A simpler way to understand it, is to imagine God standing in front of a mirror. The image in the mirror is Jesus. Therefore, He said, "He who has seen Me has seen the Father" (John 14:9). Which is also to say: The complete image in the mirror...

Indeed, everything of the world is subject to time passing and decay, and comes to an end. To the contrary, the message of the gospel of Christ is not one of endless days of the flesh and of this world, but one of being born [again] of the eternal spirit of God--out of this world--out of the...

That certainly is the perspective from inside the snow globe. But those are the lower thoughts of men, as opposed to the higher thoughts of God and the bigger picture. One certainly can choose to hold on to the lesser...but that is to reject Jesus's offer of being led unto all truth and the...

That's better! There was intent when God told his servants the prophets to prophecy. But otherwise, many of the Old Testament writings that turned out to be prophetic, were not the result of God saying, "Go prophecy." The writers of such passages were in fact unaware and simply lived their...

The were prophecy. But still you are not being clear.

Your premise is hard to understand. What do you mean by "acquired?"

"Thousand" spiritually means forever. The time was "before the foundation of the world" (as was the Lamb slain), and the "little while" is the times of this world.

The original premise of the thread is based on Lamentations 3:23. But yes, I did include a quote of 1 Corinthians 15:23 to express an elaboration from the scriptures regarding the order of the repetition of darkness and mercy occurring daily.

In the year 2025 (2525): CLICK HERE - by: Zager And Evans

This is at times question, a groundhog day image of the illusion of time. And if the darkness and the Lord's mercies are new every evening and morning--what is every day but a repeat of what was, making it what it now is? What does that all mean regarding creation, and even the age of this...

Yes, probably so. I suppose...if we are able to spot them and not be troubled by them, it gives us a chance to witness, backfiring the scammers intentions.

The word of God (the Bible) can indeed be trusted. However, the Bible itself (God) declares the error of the church including some of the church fathers. Peter said of this church age, "there were also false prophets among the people, even as there will be false teachers among you, who will...

No, that does not answer the question--you left out 1,500 years where "the spirit of anti-Christ was already at work", with apparent total disregard and denial of the 5 out of 7 churches that Jesus reported He had "somewhat against." Your claims are against Christ. So, no, you did not find what...

It is you who needs to be honest. Here you have done it again, calling God's/Jesus' gospel "Paul's." Make up your mind, and stop speaking out of both sides of your mouth.

What you just did there--it's not original. But it is biblical, made famous by the father of lies. So shall it be written.

You're hedging and waffling, sometimes stating things correctly, and sometimes still defending your own claim that not even Paul would defend, nor did he. It's enough.

Mary, how is it that you have not factored in that Jesus found "somewhat against" 5 out of the 7 early churches in Revelation; that Peter warned of false teachers entering into the church spreading destructive doctrines; and Paul foretold the believing of a "lie" that would without a doubt cause...

I just gave an answer for this in post #172. Which, is not determined by one's own actions, but by He who sent him--if he was actually sent by God..

And this you add to by attributing Paul's gospel to Paul himself, when he qualified and clarified his every claim was only Christ crucified. Now, it is true that Paul spoke for Christ, as he said, "for me to live, is Christ." Which does not make his doctrinal claim his own rather than Christ's...