Search results

I don't "think", but know that it is God who defines His own word, and when and where it is applicable. In this case, it is applicable to your mocking God by mocking the idea that what I have told you is from God, and that you are in a position to challenge it.

I already explained the greater meaning of that "little wine" passage. In any case, it is not you who decides what is and is not "church doctrine", but God alone.

No, that is not how it happened, nor how it is written. On the contrary, foretold destructive doctrines entered the church by false teachers teaching a lie that has caused strong delusion and great apostacy.

That phrase, was it from God, or men, or translators and their cultural word studies?

Yes, the church has also rejected Christ. Israel rejected Him in the flesh, and the church has rejected Him in spirit by believing the foretold lie and destructive doctrines of false teachers.

Again.

For the record then. There will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

A myth accusation against the word of God, is more than a literary statement.

You continuing in your assumptions accuse me, then you ask for what you do not know, projecting your own ignorance and arrogance upon me. See how you are? Meanwhile, my knowledge is from God. Why do you continue to assume I have only interpreted what is written?

You [you] reasoning your way through that verse, is simply you explaining away the potential for greater meaning by God who made no such stipulation. You are hindering the Holy Spirit by teaching according to your own understanding. Example: You say that a little wine being good for stress (or...

That is an endearing sentiment....but your Spouse just happens to be a King.

Thank you for that explanation, for a Christian ought not speak as if God's word is myth themselves. The "myth" outlook however, is true of all explanations, many even requiring more faith than what is true from God.

This is your explanation, so noted: "All scripture is given for: Doctrine" "But not all scripture is : Doctrine."

Your assumption of me being "snarky" goes along with your assumption that I have an "interpretation" and have pit it against your own, as if your admitted "interpretation" is possibly equal to my God given knowledge on the matter. It is not. Anyway--you answered, admitting that your...

That is what failed belief looks and sounds like. For your information, you are looking at it all wrong. That is not what or how the world works. On the contrary, the world is everything everyone ever believed made manifest as evidence for or against us all before the Judgement. Then comes the end.

"Unbiblical" was my assertion. I was asking about yours.

And by what means did you come by these unbiblical assertions?

Not just Judas, but the leaders, Priests, and Pharisees. How does that translate or mean as a foreshadowing regarding current events? How indeed! But just as no one suspected the Priests and Pharisees--no one now has suspected anything similar. Unfortunately.

There are no contradictions in the word of God, only misunderstandings. As for Noah's Ark, God has said that before a matter springs forth, He tells us of it (Isaiah 42:9). In many cases, that means showing us, or making a spiritual (unseen) matter manifest physically that it may be seen. But...

There is nothing wrong with what Paul said or taught. But to limit what he said as being "local" only after God has made it eternally applicable to all--that is wrong.