Search results

Copy/paste, and provide the post number of, your hallucinated allegation.

Copy/paste, and provide the post number of, your hallucinated allegation.

I think I'm on ewq1938's ignore, but the Greek clearly proves him wrong. Strong's Greek: 3625. οἰκουμένη (oikoumené) -- the inhabited earth (biblehub.com) "c. the whole inhabited earth, the world... the inhabitants of the earth, men: Acts 17:6, 31"

Which specific verse(s) are you referring to?

Peter's letter was not limited to Jews, but was rather to Christian believers in the referenced churches, which would have included both Jewish and Gentile converts from OT Judaism. In 1 Peter 2:9, he characterizes them correctly as a spiritual nation. Peter was under no illusions about Israel...

So you've never heard of copy/paste or a post number. There's another name for an intentional misrepresentation. Lie.

As expected, another one of your baseless accusations. Either provide the evidence of your accusation that I've demanded, or admit to your intentional misrepresentation.

Jesus' physical temple was destroyed and resurrected in 30 AD. Jerusalem's physical temple was destroyed in 70 AD and will never be resurrected. Jesus' disciples knew the difference.

Matthew 24 2 And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down. 3 And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things...

Speculation, conjecture, and presumption is an opinion. Verifiable historical evidence is not. Ask any historically-aware Jew if he/she would rather die by gas/bullet, or by crucifixion. That will tell you something.

Keraz, you understand who God's Chosen People are. You just don't understand the fulness of what He has given us. His New Covenant.

You would need to prove: 1. That the cited historical events were not wars and rumors of wars, even though they are historically verifiable as such. 2. That "ye" in the prophecy were not Jesus' disciples, even though He addressed them, and they heard Him, and they lived during the cited...

The cited historical events qualify as wars and rumors of wars, fulfilling that part of Jesus' prophecy.

Copy/paste my misquote of you, including the post number.

It is the uninterrupted teaching of more than 17 centuries of Christian orthodoxy. The disciples received it. (Matthew 26:28) I and Randy K have received it. (2 Corinthians 3:6) Sorry about you.

You were the first to reference 1948 Israel. That's what I was debating. Wasn't that part of your context? If not, why did you reference it? Are you allowed to reference 1948 Israel, but I'm not?

I have no idea what you're talking about. There's no such thing as hijacking a conversation. This is an open public forum wherein anyone can respond at any time to any post, without depriving anyone else of the opportunity to do the same. Haven't you figured that out yet?

Before 70 AD. WARS AND RUMORS OF WARS Matthew: "And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars. See that ye be not troubled; for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet. For nation shall rise against nation and kingdom against kingdom" (24:6,7). Mark: "And when ye shall hear...

A covenant is not in force and effect until each party begins to fulfill its associated responsibilities. God offered His Covenant to each individual Israelite. Is that what you mean by "made"? If an Israelite did not accept His Covenant and begin to fulfill his responsibilities, the penalty...

The definition of a valid covenant stipulates a relationship between two parties, in which each has responsibilities which must be fulfilled, in order for the covenant to be established and to continue. Failure by either party to fulfill its responsibilities results in a breached covenant...