Search results

It is Cady that does not make sense.

You say this because you (or no Pretrib) can refute the Posttrib argument. The Op stands unchanged and unwavering.

I am content, the reader can see who is addressing the text and representing it correct.

I wonder do you fully read the text (or parable) before you come out with things like this. So often it seems like you force your thinking into the sacred text. That is called eisegesis. Jesus said "The field is the world." The wheat and tares are a symbolic collective inclusive representation...

This sums up the futility of your position. It proves that you have nothing of biblical weight to bring to the table. That is why you must invent these irrelevancies.

And where exactly does it say in Revelation 20 that it is peaceful for 1000 years? It is not there. You make it up as you go.

This is why you do not seem to understand this subject. You do not grasp the new covenant arrangement or the teaching of Paul on this matter. You constantly force your theology upon the sacred text. To the enlightened (and unblinkered) this is clear.

There has always been 2 Israels - believing and unbelieving, elect and unelected (Romans 9:6). Jacob represented the elect; Esau represented the rejected Israel (Romans 9:9-13). Both had the same Hebrew blood, both were of a privileged natural lineage - but one was true Israel, the other not...

That special favor finished with the termination of the old covenant.

Hello! We have entered the new covenant. The old is gone forever. Race means nothing today. It is all about grace. The Gospel is open equally to Jews and Gentiles alike. There is no racial favoritism any more. Thank God! We have moved from the old to the new covenant. The rules have therefore...

It is not just that. You are trying to take us back to that arrangement of racial distinction and favor. That wall has been broken down by the cross.

Lol. Do you understand that all flesh are destroyed in Revelation 19. There are no mortal wicked to enter into your imaginary future millennium as the sand of the sea.

How difficult is it to get your head around the fact that we will join Christ in shepherding the nations at the judgment? That is what the word really means. If you would take the time to check the original Greek before posting you would notice that there is no mention of your future imaginary...

So true. No survivors!

You are quoting OT Scripture and trying to take us back there.

Yes you did. That what you are promoting. There is no ethnic favor today as you suggest.

I have gave you the evidence. Your fight is clearly with Scripture. Not wise!

It is time to enter the New Covenant. The old is gone. There are no racial favors under the new.

His covenant is not with an ethnic physical nation today, especially one that rejects Him. He has already cursed the fig tree. The old ethnic theocracy is gone forever. He is committed to a new nation, a spiritual nation, the International NT Church, true Israel, those that accept His Son - the...

Not true. Again, you are constantly butchering the meaning of words in order to fit your false teaching. The word "holy" refers to the "saints" of God. It is talking about those that have a personal relationship with God. It is not talking about children of the devil. It speaks about those that...