Search results

Wow! What a cop out! This response says it all! Every poster needs to read this. This sums up the whole debate between Pretrib and Amil. And, Atheists are not interested in the Word of God. They don't believe it. To rubbish the Word away (as you do) is pitiful. It exposes your doctrine. This is...

I have showed you that the Church was in the wilderness with Moses. The Church is mentioned throughout the Greek old testament. The Church is mentioned before Pentecost. Your belief is contrary to Scripture.

Not true. You have nothing. Quote the text in full that teaches that. You cannot because it does not exist.

LOL. This has been your mistaken mantra for years. The reality is: you cannot defend your position with corroboration. Your position is dead. You're in love with what you've been taught not what the Bible teaches.

Not so! You constantly invent red herrings and then run with your imagined misrepresentation. When that is debunked you run. You love talking on our behalf. But, you are not qualified to do that. Your aim is to discredit Amil at any cost, even if it means misrepresentation. The sad part is...

This is all noise! How about finally showing us a passage that teaches a rapture of the church, followed by seven year tribulation, followed by a third coming?

When did/does Christ rise to the right hand of majesty on high? Where does Scripture locate that throne – in heaven or on earth? If Christ is God, if He is genuinely sovereign and if He is reigning now, what enemy do you suppose He not ruling over? When was/is “all power … in heaven and in...

Do you really grasp the power that Jesus Christ has over all creation? Do you realize the enormity of His authority and influence? Or do you believe that man or Satan is out of control and that Jesus is just sitting by helplessly watching on? Unfortunately, many Christians today have a...

This is true. Most of what he presents is misrepresentations of Amil because over the years he has learned he has no rebuttals for that position. He cannot carry a discussion or passage to it's logical conclusion. His tactic is: try to create an issue where there is none, then hit and run.

I am confident the reader can see who is presenting biblical truth and who is not. That is the only reason I am engaging with you.

Jesus had a better way (ordained by His Father) of winning the nations - the cross. He simply refused to take a shortcut here by submitting to the devil's blueprint.

He may rule your world but not mine. Jesus rules the kingdom of God and rules the nations.

Peter disagrees with you in Acts 2:29-36, saying: “Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulchre is with us unto this day. Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit...

I reject your small jesus and BIG DEVIL theology.

You do not have one single passage to prove your doctrine Where is it? All I see in your posts is your own opinions and loads of noise.

Keep your warnings. Back to you. I refuse your nonsense.

The Bible was not written originally in Latin. It was written in Hebrew and Greek. And, no, the English interpretation of harpazo was/is "caught up." Also, the Bible does not teach your error.

Observe;: they have nothing to refute apart from avoidance and insults. They have zero proof-texts.

The wrath of God brings immediate and total destruction to the wicked, just like in Noah's day and in Sodom. You cannot deal with that because it totally exposes your doctrine.

Again, no Scripture. Just opinions.