Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. R

    OSAS being False Doctrine!

    You better start praying that when you commit sin, and you will (so will I), that you don't suddenly die! Because according to your erroneous doctrine Christ did not redeem you from that sin! What a polluted doctrine, without comfort, or peace! Why is it important for a Christian to repent...
  2. R

    OSAS being False Doctrine!

    None of those you posted say CHRISTIANS fall away from THE faith or lose their salvation! You know this or you would be able to answer the question of why God chastens whom He loves, and you cannot! God does not forsake, He chastens whom He loves! Why can you not reconcile this FACT with your...
  3. R

    The 144,000 before God at the end.

    Scripture ????? More speculation without proof from Scripture??? Christians are not appointed to God's WRATH, but as I said Scripture is filled with verses that speak of us going through great tribulation until the seventh angel sounds.
  4. R

    OSAS being False Doctrine!

    So you show you clearly understand that when a Christian sins, he/she will be chastised by God but not forsaken, but still you continue to argue Christians can lose their salvation??? That makes you not deceived, but rather a deceiver! You need to repent and turn to the truth and stop...
  5. R

    OSAS being False Doctrine!

    Prove from the Word of God that Christians fall away! I can't help but notice that you haven't answered the question for why God chastens whom He loves? I really don't care what different denominations teach! I care about what sayeth the Scriptures, and can my understanding be reconciled, or...
  6. R

    The 144,000 before God at the end.

    The ark was sealed! Yes, Noah was present, but safe in the ark while the flood filled the earth. He was not taken from the earth, but kept safe during it. Noah is not in heaven during the great flood that filled the earth. He was on the earth both before, during and after the destruction of...
  7. R

    OSAS being False Doctrine!

    Confusion comes when we cannot reconcile every verse of Scripture. It comes because we force error and contradiction into God's Holy Word. Perhaps the spirit of darkness you speak of is causing you to be confused??? Do you walk perfectly by the Spirit and never give in to the desires of your...
  8. R

    OSAS being False Doctrine!

    NO! When we have been born again we HAVE eternal life in Christ. When we sin we reap CORRECTION from God, because He loves His own and will not allow us to continue in sin. You must reconcile Heb 2:6-7 with your doctrine, or continue to force your contradiction upon the Word of God. Why...
  9. R

    OSAS being False Doctrine!

    This is nice opinion, but where is the Scripture to prove what you assume? Are you now perfect, never choosing to sin? It seems you're saying we are in the Lord, oops we sin, we're not in the Lord, we repent, we're in the Lord again, oops we sin again we're not in the Lord etc etc etc ??? Very...
  10. R

    OSAS being False Doctrine!

    Ephesians 2:3-9 (KJV) Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others. But God, who is rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us, Even...
  11. R

    OSAS being False Doctrine!

    Whoever would teach we can live as the heathens and be saved according to grace through faith, has not experienced being born again!
  12. R

    OSAS being False Doctrine!

    What exactly according to Scripture does "reaping what we sow" mean? Does it speak of eternal loss (lose salvation), or material/physical loss in this life? Have you never read: Hebrews 12:6-7 (KJV) For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth. If ye...
  13. R

    The 144,000 before God at the end.

    Noah came through the flood, he was not taken from the flood, but sustained in the ark through it. For your argument to be true, Noah would not have been on earth when the flood waters came. Noah is a depiction of great tribulation that comes upon this earth, and how Christians are assured...
  14. R

    The 144,000 before God at the end.

    The Bible doesn't use the term "ethnic", but these 144,000 are said to be of all the tribes of the children of Israel. Why make this distinction between the Israel of Old and the innumerable multitude if speaking of all Christians? It's not uncommon in Scripture to find Israel of old that...
  15. R

    The 144,000 before God at the end.

    Christians are sealed with the Holy Spirit the moment we are born again; the moment we believe we have eternal life and shall never die. Our body will die, but we will still be alive through Christ's Spirit in us. The 144,000 of all the tribes of the children of Israel are the remnant of Old...
  16. R

    Jesus's "siblings".

    Since Joseph did not have sexual intercourse with Mary before Christ was born, proving a virgin gave birth, how do you prove it does not also mean after Jesus's birth he did? You have no biblical authority to back up your assumption for perpetual virginity of Mary. Your OPINIONS UNPROVEN don't...
  17. R

    Jesus's "siblings".

    Mt 1:25 - Matthew 1:25 (KJVSL) And καί knew γινώσκω her αὐτός not οὐ [till ἕως οὗ] she had brought forth τίκτω her αὐτός firstborn πρωτότοκος son υἱός: and καί he called καλέω his αὐτός name ὄνομα JESUS Ἰησοῦς. Strong's Greek Dictionary 2193. ἕως heos (héōs) Search for G2193 in KJVSL; in...
  18. R

    Jesus's "siblings".

    I have no intention of rehashing your opinions. The topic I raised is in regards to the marital relationship between a husband and wife after the birth of Christ. Can you disprove from the Word of God that the marriage between Joseph and Mary was without sexual relationship after the birth of...
  19. R

    Jesus's "siblings".

    Your so-called refutation above doesn't refute anything I said. It is only your OPINION without biblical prooftexts. While I agree with the opinion that the statement dispels any belief that Joseph was the father, that does not prove that J&M did not have a normal marital relationship after...
  20. R

    Jesus's "siblings".

    After the birth of Jesus it would be foolish to suggest there was no conjugal relationship between Joseph and Mary. And even though "firstborn" is not found is some manuscripts, the fact remains, this passage from Scripture indicates a normal marital relationship commenced between J&M after the...