Search results

So, you don't accept what is indicated in John 19:20 and Hebrews 13:12 then? Are those verses missing from your Bible? Or do you think this verse somehow cancels those verses out? You obviously have given no thought to what that passage means and you obviously don't care if you interpret one...

What do you mean by that? I have no idea of what you're trying to say. What is your understanding of the identity of Babylon in the book of Revelation? Just because Babylon has some things in common with ancient Jerusalem doesn't make it ancient Jerusalem. Some of the descriptions of Babylon...

Jesus was crucified outside of Jerusalem. Try again. John 19:20 Then many of the Jews read this title, for the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city; and it was written in Hebrew, Greek, and Latin. Hebrews 13:12 Therefore Jesus also, that He might sanctify the people with His own...

No doubt you are wrong. Tell me how Jerusalem ever reigned over the kings of the earth (Revelation 17:18). Tell me how Jerusalem was "a prison for every foul spirit, and a cage for every unclean and hated bird!" (Revelation 18:2). Tell me how "all the nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath...

You are once again being ignorant and foolish. Preterists typically believe that all or most of the Olivet Discourse and all or most of the book of Revelation is fulfilled. I do NOT believe that. Is there something hard about this that you don't understand? I disagree with preterists on many...

So, I guess I can say that you cherry picked then? The fact of the matter is that not all translations translate that verse the same. But, the translation I quoted is accurate and the ones you quoted are not. But, believe what you want. He was not slain before the foundation of the world. He was...

LOL. So, just go ahead and stick with following after standard dispensationalist theology that takes a highly symbolic book as literally as possible then. It's a poor choice, but if that's what you want to do, so be it. And I see that you have once again not addressed why the two witnesses are...

Please get your memory checked because I've answered these questions several times before. No. You already know that I believe the two witnesses represent the church witnessing throughout the world. Or, at least, you should know that since I've told you that several times. No. How could that...

That would explain why you don't know that you are deceived by the false pre-trib rapture theory. Jesus explicitly taught a post-trib rapture. Listen to Jesus. Mark 13:24 “But in those days, after that tribulation, the sun will be darkened and the moon will not give its light, 25 and the stars...

You forgot Matthew 24:29-31, Mark 13:24-27, 2 Thessalonians 1:10 and 2 Thessalonians 2:1.

You are misinterpreting Revelation 13:8. That verse talks about the book of life of the Lamb who was slain being written from the foundation of the world. It's not talking about the lamb (Jesus, obviously) being slain before the foundation of the world. Revelation 13:8 (NASB): All who live on...

Waiting? LOL! As if I haven't already done so many times (I have). Do you just forget everything I tell you? Within the very same book as we find the description of the two witnesses, candlesticks symbolically represent churches (Revelation 1:20). You can't ignore that. I believe John would be...

Are you for real? I do NOT insist that it means animal sacrificing resumes with how you interpret it (not literally). I said it means that IF a person take Zechariah 14:16-21 literally.. If you don't, then that statement doesn't apply to you. Why can't you understand that? I know you don't...

You already should know how I answer those questions since I've already answered them many times. But, you won't ever answer my question. Tell me why the two witnesses are called two candlesticks? If you don't know, then just say so.

Do you make any effort at all to read what I tell you? It doesn't seem so. I do NOT claim that the second temple was the holy place at the time it was destroyed. I have told you that MANY times. You either have a terrible memory or terrible reading comprehension skills. I have told you many...

I don't even know what you conclude from Zechariah 14 because you won't tell us. You have never offered even a guess as to what Zechariah 14:16-21 is about. How do you interpret verses 1 to 5? Do you take them literally as talking about earthly Jerusalem and literally half of the city going into...

I guarantee that I could manipulate that AI to give a much different response than what it gave to him. AI gives responses based on the kind of input you give it. It certainly cannot be trusted at all when it comes to Bible doctrine. AI can be useful, but not for that.

I assume you mean the days that lead up to the coming of the Son of Man that Jesus compared to the days of Noah (Matthew 24:37-39)? They occur during "the tribulation", as I understand "the tribulation", which I see as referring to a time of increased deception, wickedness, apostasy and...

Why are you acting as if the parable is a real story rather than a fictional story representing something in reality? No one is going to be literally given authority over cities when Jesus returns. That fictional story figuratively represents what will happen when Jesus returns. Believers will...

What makes you think that Amil claims that the authority only lasts a single day? You have no understanding of Amil at all, yet you continue to try to speak for Amil while misrepresenting it. You do that over and over and over again. I wish I knew why. Just admit that you have no understanding...