Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. W

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    Hosea 6:1-3: “Come, and let us return unto the LORD: for he hath torn, and he will heal us; he hath smitten, and he will bind us up. After two days will he revive us: in the third day he will raise us up, and we shall live in his sight. Then shall we know, if we follow on to know the LORD: his...
  2. W

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    There is one sacrifice for sin, one new covenant. This demolishes your false teaching.
  3. W

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    Much of Revelation is lent from ancient OT realities - like the ancient ceremonies, the ancient plagues in Egypt, ancient enemies of Israel, and ancient events in history, to symbolically represent spiritual truths write the intra-Advent period.
  4. W

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    Did you read what I wrote in the first line?
  5. W

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    He isn't even Amil. He is Postmil. No wonder you do not understand Amillennialism.
  6. W

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    It must either be an ancient battle, or else it is a modern symbolic battle. What it definitely isn’t is a literal modern battle as most Premils argue. The transport is ancient – “horses” (Ezekiel 38:4) and “chariots” (Ezekiel 39:20). The weapons are ancient – “bows and the arrows” (Ezekiel...
  7. W

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    That NT ekklesia was alive and kicking after the cross. But it was empowered at Pentecost to fulfill the great commission.
  8. W

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    LOL. Because this is not talking about any of that. You are butchering Scripture.
  9. W

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    Christ-rejecting Jews are blind to God's truth. If their eyes were open, they would be Christians.
  10. W

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    Where in Ezekiel 39 does it mention a rapture of the church before a tribulation period? Where does it mention the Church? Where does it mentioned a rapture? Where does it mention a tribulation period Where does it mention a 3rd coming?
  11. W

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    Have you asked them all?
  12. W

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    I told you: the NT writers did it for me.
  13. W

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    Many ancient burials are long gone. That is why we have many unexpected finds in modern times. Ancient scholars and historians (who are objective) disagree with your claims. You make it up as you go. You constantly manipulate Scripture to support your error. Where in Ezekiel 39 does it...
  14. W

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    I quoted the text. Study it for yourself and you will see the error of your position.
  15. W

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    You do not have eyes to see here. Truth is by revelation, not mere knowledge (or what you have been taught).
  16. W

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    I already showed you that Psalm 2 relates to the intra-Advent period. As usual you reject it. The NT writers forbid your claims. Ezekiel 39 is an ancient battle. So what is Gog/Magog? When does that happen? Where in Ezekiel 39 does it even mention a rapture of the church before a tribulation...
  17. W

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    Talk about twisting scripture. You obviously have nothing.
  18. W

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    Israel is the old covenant ekklesia, congregation, assembly, gathering or church.
  19. W

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    Ek means out of or from. The New Jerusalem comes out of or from heaven. Simple! No need to explain that away.
  20. W

    Amil can only be proved to be true if Amils accept all of the following terms and convincingly satisfy these terms.

    No. There are a lot of OT texts pertaining to the ceremonial law that were terminated at the cross. The land promises closely correlate. There is no mention of any land promises in the NT. That is because Christ is man's inheritance under the new covenant.
Top Bottom