Search results

So, this thread and your thesis is dead. It is a deception. It is theological politicking. It is an illusion. Just like I suspected. Sad! Pride will not let you apologize when you have been caught on. Your claims are blatantly false.

No. You are telling deliberate lies about the ECFs of which you admit you have NO actual evidence to support your claims, and, yet, you refuse to remove it and apologize. This says a lot about you. Sorry. I will back up my ECF claims with hard quotes.

You are deflecting now. I'm asking you: where did you get your evidence? Where is your historic evidence that "There is no historical evidence that the allegorical method was to interpret the scriptures in the first 200 years or so after Jesus"? Where is your historic evidence that "It wasn't...

I am not here to defend the RCC. I do not accept them as bona-fide Christianity. They are apostate. However, I find modern-day Premil "historians" and "authorities" to be so ignorant, bias and deceptive in their analyze. The fact that RCC historians are more reliable is telling!

By the way, I do not engage with you to change your mind. I know that you are married to your beliefs. I ask these questions to expose the erroneous nature of your position. Your avoidance reinforces the Amil thesis. Others can see that you have no answer to the biblical facts.

Your whole thesis is based on a misrepresentation of the ECFs. Yet, you refuse to remove the error you are propagating. Do you think: if you state a thing that makes it a fact? Well, that is not the way it works. The first principle of evidence is: "he who alleges must approve."

I was actually making a general observation of my experience at reading Premil historians online when it comes to the ECFs. They all repeat the same uninformed error. I stand by it. It is a fact. It was not personal. Now, will you admit that your whole thesis here is moot? ECFs is "early Church...

More avoidance of simple questions. You have to!

The same Shepherd who tenderly watches over the sheep of His pasture with a rod of care and correction is the same Shepherd who wields the rod of righteous anger against the goats at the end. The same rod that is used to protect and preserve the sheep during their existence is employed at the...

Not so. That is your opinion and it is wrong. The millennial period covers the last days.

Once again, you avoid my questions. You have to! You constantly make claims that you're not able to prove in Scripture.

But this is the whole basis of your argument and of this thread. This thread is absolutely moot until you support your claims with hard historic evidence. This was one of the overriding reasons I took it upon myself about 12 years ago to research the ECFs in depth - Christians quoting erroneous...

Not so. Days have continued since then. So it cannot be the last day. There is the coming of the Lord on the last day. There is the general resurrection on the last day. That has not happened yet.

Not so. Who is "the first resurrection" in Acts 26:23 and Revelation 20:6? Who is "the firstborn from the dead" in Colossians 1:18? Who is "the firstfruits of them that slept" in 1 Corinthians 15:20? Who is "first begotten of the dead" in Revelation 1:5?

I told you word "rule" means "shepherd." This is what happens at the end at the judgment. Everything is regenerated when Jesus comes. This is the end of the world. This is clear and climactic. I suspect you see that. The second coming ushers in the end. The both are tied together in...

The abyss is not a geographical place but a spiritual condition of restraint. Please remember demons are spirits. Satan and his minions were injured at the cross, Satan’s head is now bruised. His movement is impaired. He is incapacitated. Satan is a spiritual being. We are therefore looking in...

Amen. I was brought up similar. My struggle from when I was young was: where was the biblical passage that taught what Scoffield was teaching. I could not find one single passage in Scripture that taught a rapture of the Church, followed by seven year tribulation, followed by a third coming. It...

Where did you get your evidence? Where is your historic evidence that "There is no historical evidence that the allegorical method was to interpret the scriptures in the first 200 years or so after Jesus"? Where is your historic evidence that "It wasn't until roughly the start of the 3rd...

In Matthew 16 we see authority (or keys) being delegated to the Church, “I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And I will give unto thee the keys (or authority) of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind (or chain or shackle) on earth shall be...

I deleted my opening statement. I apologize for the offence. It is so difficult listening to such blatant error. But i have no desire to deliberately offend.