Search results

Better to listen than to open ones mouth and begin to theorize as if actually knowing anything. Fools rush in.

Why do you theorize--do you not know that was the very reason the Bride was told to be silent in church?

Go as spies into the land, fear not the giants, and stand with Joshua and Caleb when giving your report. God is with you!

None of which makes void the other half of what is written that shows Peter as lovingly, "Satan", and three-time "denier of knowing Christ" dressed down by Jesus before being redeemed. But what is written of the Holy Spirit, the power of God given to the church? "He will not speak on His own...

:(

Don't be sorry as for me, but be sorry as in: Luke 23:28 I answered that in the post you were replying to. What else have you missed, or passed over? Because Peter was the head--not of the body, but the leader of the disciples whom made up the body, which as Jesus' body, was given charge and...

I wouldn't call it a planned agenda on the part of Satan, but rather an actual divide upon actual lines of belief, as a manifestation against God. We each are born unto ourselves to be what we are as evidence for or against us in the Judgment. This life is each of us dividing ourselves by our...

You (and many) have nearly deciphered the riddle, but not finished, and have thus missed the mark. Alternatively, many have taken a side trip making Peter out to be more than a member of one body where all members are equal, though some may seem to be more important and yet are not. The fact...

The flesh is unto death, but the Spirit unto life. Example: Luke 9:24 (NKJV) For whoever desires to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for My sake will save it. Evil spirits campaign for the flesh. Beware of those who campaign for the glory of the flesh, of which there is...

This is a good word for current world events.

A stone may leave ripples. ;) I guess I'm one of those-- All kidding aside, "He Himself gave some to be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, and some pastors and teachers," etc. and then there are also many wannabes, and the antis--there's quite a mix. Such is the mix in this world where...

PS, ...and you don't listen very well. Or is it your comprehension?

There are many scientists that believe in God, and perhaps what you have presented would be better said of atheists--but your point is well taken, and much of science is just as you say.

I did not "disagree" with you, nor have I given you anything that is mine against what you have presented, but have only shown you by the scriptures the error of many including yourself. God knows.

No, but you have not fully considered the confusion God intentionally placed upon all language that it should be discerned spiritually, and "you have taken away the key of knowledge. You did not enter in yourself, and those who were entering in you hindered.” The Priests and the Pharisees also...

By that logic Jesus is a baby sheep, and our charge is to light candles and lamps and not put them under a basket...literally. As I said, and Jesus said before, "the words are spirit", and to interpret them literarily is foolishness.

Perhaps I misunderstood you to be speaking against Marty's point as well as Paul's. Now I see why you laughed. My apologies if that is the case! And you are correct--I have not read all the posts in the thread, but was just responding to your response to Marty's OP.

It means there was no matter as yet, and all was spirit...as God is spirit. "Cause" on the other hand is what changed that, and the cause was God, who spoke all things of form and matter into existence.

That is a matter of interpretation of the word as definitive to your own liking, meaning you are simply claiming yours is a better interpretation. Even so, even giving you the benefit of the doubt (which does surely exist with the original word)--your attempt is to take it literally, while the...

Why have you added the above (in red)?