Search results

I see it as the conforming church restricting the power of the Holy Sprit

I see it as the conforming church restricting the power of the Holy Sprit

Yes but we could already be in the time of satans release I believe so

It’s not that we don’t believe in one we just have a different opinion on what it is

I have no idea who you think believes all of this we are never Gods. We believe what Paul actually taught shown below Revelation 20:4 4 I saw thrones on which were seated those who had been given authority to judge. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony...

Rev 20:5 (The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were ended.) This is the first resurrection. 6 Blessed and holy are those who share in the first resurrection. The second death has no power over them, And when do the rest of the dead come back to life? Rev 20:11...

Amen Revelation 3:14 14 “To the angel of the church in Laodicea write: These are the words of the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the ruler of God’s creation.

Once again that’s the thousand year binding not the reigning. Revelation 20:5 shows us when the thousand year reigning ends at the end of our world on the resurrection day

No only the binding ends during our world 1 Corrinthians 15 24 Then the end will come, when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father after he has destroyed all dominion, authority and power. 25 For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. 26 The last enemy to be...

You are confusing the binding and the reigning it is the thousand year binding that ends not the thousand year reigning they are different Jesus doesn’t reign because satan is bound Jesus reigns because He is God

You really are confusing in your replies to me you say random things and then claim that I believe things that I don't believe. I really do understand what you’re getting at.

The Olivit discourse was within 40 years of 70AD that is within one generation I still have no idea why you bring Paul into this

Once again you claim something that you think I believe that I don’t. I have never said that Rome is the fourth kingdom because I don’t believe that they are. Do you notice that you’re debating with me is based on things that I have never said?

Of course Jesus was talking about 70AD and not the second coming that was my point you keep miss understanding what I am saying and miss quoting me. I have no idea why you are talking about Paul

So you’re avoiding by saying I’m that avoiding. Im not avoiding because I said that they have appeared.

I wasn’t clearly shown anything you just posted some peoples views

Why did you avoid the Luke 19 verses? Rome did it in their own evil ways for Gods purpose Just as shown in Revelation 17

Once again you say I said something that I haven’t said

Why claim that I think revelation was written in 68-69 AD when I have never claimed or even believe that? These are all peoples views written way after 70AD and none of them are biblical authority. They are just views just like the many views I have read for the earlier date.

Of course they hadn’t shown up yet at the time revelation was written God used Rome to destroy Jerusalem for His purpose Luke 19 41 As he approached Jerusalem and saw the city, he wept over it 42 and said, “If you, even you, had only known on this day what would bring you peace—but now it is...