Search results

But those studies are wrong because the character and purpose of the antichrist is nothing like the little horn What John describes in his epistles is the perfect description of apostate Israel in Johns day remember he said that some had already come To me it’s a demonic being influencing...

That description in Daniel is nothing like the description and purpose described by John in his epistles

How can you think that John got the antichrist from Daniels little horn when his description is nothing like the little horn? I can understand people thinking that the beast of revelation is like the little horn but not the antichrist

Yes they will too be raised physically along with the wicked at the end of our world but the first resurrection is spiritual

Read about the fourth beast in Daniel again and then see if the beast of revelation or Daniels fourth beast is described anything like Johns description of the antichrist Here are the only descriptions of the antichrist in the entire bible 1 John 2:18 18 Dear children, this is the last...

The saints first resurrection is spiritual the wicked is physical

No but sin is. Sin is choosing your autonomy over Gods will for your life bas self worship The mark of the beast was being devoted to the beast (the mark on the head) and doing its will (the mark on the right han)

They are completely different as the text shows different combatants and different outcomes and different purposes. You also have to separate the antichrist and the beast you even used both terms in the same sentence. Just like John describes the battles differently with different combatants...

That’s not what I’m claiming at all I’m say that if it’s literal then all flesh means all flesh Im claiming that it’s symbolic for Jesus defeating all of His enemies over time with the sword of His mouth which is all powerful and the only weapon He needs

But it says horses too Im not the one saying that’s it’s literal you guys are

First it says all flesh so if literal it’s all flesh Second your mistake is that you think the battle in chapter 16 is the same as the battle in chapter 19 So to stay true to scripture Rev 16 is the battle at Armageddon which is the kings and the beast destroying Babylon the great which is...

But it doesn’t say that it separates the armies and people so if its literal it’s all people Revelation 19:17-18 17 And I saw an angel standing in the sun, who cried in a loud voice to all the birds flying in midair, “Come, gather together for the great supper of God, 18 so that you may eat...

So if its literal then is the fresh of all people eaten by the birds?

Yes of course but it says that they eat the flesh of all people so who could be around for the thousand years?

The city now that God loves in revelation chapter 20 is the new Jerusalem the church Hebrews 12:23-23 22 But you have come to Mount Zion, to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem. You have come to thousands upon thousands of angels in joyful assembly, 23 to the church of the...

The army in revelation 20 is the conformed world which surround the dwindling church the camp of Gods people the city He loves

Because a lot of the church conforms I already explained that, Armageddon has nothing to do with the thousand years

Scripture doesn't say that in either of those verse I quoted in both of those chapters scripture actually says that babylon the great is destroyed

You missed verse 19 of chapter 16 19 The great city split into three parts, and the cities of the nations collapsed. God remembered Babylon the Great and gave her the cup filled with the wine of the fury of his wrath. I also never said that Babylon is a part of chapter 19 because she isn’t