Search results

No the thousand years is symbolic for the NT church age

Actually scripture says that satan is bound by deceiving the nations not from battles The difference is what we think that the bible is. The key is the great chain which is the power of the gospel which prevents satan from deceiving whoever chooses to believe it

It never happened literally is a sign of being cursed and judged People are supposed to eat animals not the other way around. Revelation isn’t a literal battle its a symbolic image of Jesus defeating all of His enemies over time with the sword of His mouth which is His word and is all powerful...

Armageddon isn’t a battle against the Lamb it is against Babylon the great in chapter 16 and 17

I’ll have to get back to this later but if you think that the beast and these kings destroy Babylon the great how about these verses? Revelation 17:16-18 16 The beast and the ten horns you saw will hate the prostitute. They will bring her to ruin and leave her naked; they will eat her flesh and...

Yes there is only one second appearing of Jesus and it’s in the future I am referring to His coMing in judgement which isn’t an appearing

Because your thinking what the thousand years is is wrong we reign in life now over death and sin

No we are talking about Babylon because she is part of Armageddon in chapter 16 If you can’t answer the rest of the questions then it’s useless to continue to debate I posted relevent scriptures which proves you wrong all you have to answer is yes or no you need to put your pride aside

Yes

The thousand years started at the cross

Kind of yes But its not the antichrist it’s the beast as John describes the beast and their purposes different The battle at Armageddon was Rome destroying Jerusalem in 70AD and the people were the Jews who realize that they rejected and killed their God and messiah

I proved with the scriptures that they are not the same battle. I proved through scripture they have different combatants and different outcomes. All you have said is that I’m wrong The only way to prove and clarify it is with straight simply questions so please answer these questions with a...

Jesus has come in judgement many times for example Rev 2:16 16 Repent therefore! Otherwise, I will soon come to you and will fight against them with the sword of my mouth. This threat happened if they didn't repent. Notice that Jesus even used the same description of His coming as chapter 19...

Why would you think that? I have been talking about the rest of chapter 16 the whole time which applies and shows the difference between both chapters.

First chapter 16 states that Babylon the great is destroyed and chapter 17 shows who does it. That doesn’t happen in chapter 19 the beast and false prophet are destroyed in chapter 19. Second if all flesh is killed and eaten by the birds then who is left to live through the thousand years if...

But chapter 16 states that Babylon is destroyed and chapter 17 shows who does it. That doesn’t happen in chapter 19 the beast and false prophet are destroyed in chapter 19 how can you not see that it’s clear in the scriptures?

Yes they people of Israel weeped when Jesus came in judgement when Rome destroyed her for Gods purpose. They weeped because they would of realized who Jesus was when His prophecy happened when He said that it would happen proving that He was their God and messiah

Revelation 16 clearly shows that it is the judgement of Babylon the great and revelation 17 shows that it is the beast and the kings that do it for Gods purpose. That’s why the kings are mentioned in ch 16. Revelation 19 clearly shows that it is the judgment of the beast and the false prophet...

No there are many others. Chapter 17 confirms it

Amen brother I do I’m just trying to show that today Is the day of salvation don’t wait till Jesus comes back because that will be too late. If the beast and his armies are gathered to make war with the lamb and His armies then it would look like they know when Jesus comes back but no one does...