Search results

Yes, it does. Repeatedly. If Satan is not a created personal spirit being, then how do you explain this passage which portrays Satan as appearing before the Lord and talking to Him? Job 1:6 Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came...

Perhaps you should act like an adult instead of like a child. Was my question asking you what you believe too difficult for you? Are you afraid to tell me for some reason? If you are not a Premill and you also disagree with my Amill view, then what are you? What is your understanding of...

Think about how many times I have explained my views in detail to you, but you somehow think I'm going the route of the cop out. What a joke. No, I'm going the route of not wasting my time explaining things to someone who has no reading comprehension skills and will misrepresent my view no...

I would do that if I thought you would understand what I was telling you, but I have no confidence that you will since you have so badly misrepresented my view already. So, no, thanks. I'd rather talk to people who have reading comprehension skills.

Yeah, I was going to add that you do believe that some of Revelation 20 occurs before what is described in Revelation 19, so you should understand what I mean. And I can see that you do. Okay then. So, let's just agree to disagree on our understanding of Revelation 19 unless you have anything to...

You are being foolish. How am I proving your point when you don't even know how I understand the scriptures due to not being able to comprehend what I have said that I believe, as you have proven by misrepresenting my beliefs with your questions and comments? I showed you a passage that I don't...

Unlike you, those who are refuting his beliefs about that have actually read his posts and know what he believes, so no one is putting words in his mouth.

Somehow Judas being called "A devil" means he represents "THE devil" who is called Satan? You are acting as if Judas was called "THE devil", but he was not. Also, he was called that figuratively, not literally. Yet, other scripture talks about devils (demons) literally possessing people and...

Yes, when people don't care they take the time to share their opinions and let everyone know that they don't care. Right? LOL! You are funny. There's so many comedians on this forum who work for free.

Yes, I agree that part is chronological, but that doesn't mean that everything written in Revelation 19 occurs chronologically before everything written in Revelation 20. There's nothing that says that Satan can't be cast into the lake of fire immediately or soon after the beast and false...

LOL! How can you say this when you so clearly do not even understand what I believe due to your complete lack of reading comprehension skills? You can't refute something that you don't even understand. Do I spiritualize scripture when I see that the earth will be burned up when Jesus returns (2...

Read the verse which follows 2 Thessalonians 1:8-9. 2 Thessalonians 1:7 and to give you who are troubled rest with us when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven with His mighty angels, 8 in flaming fire taking vengeance on those who do not know God, and on those who do not obey the gospel of...

Only the KJV translates it as "the very elect" and I'm not sure why because there is no Greek word there that means "the very" or "very". They translated the Greek word "kai" as "the very" for some reason, but it's never translated as "the very" or "very" any of the other 9,000+ times that it is...

You are asking me a question that doesn't apply to what I believe (or to what anyone believes, probably), so it's not a valid question for me to answer. I'm afraid that your lack of reading comprehension skills prevents me from being able to discuss this with you.

You mean all but 8 people (Noah, his wife, his 3 sons and their wives). Do you need someone to teach you how to quote someone so we can know who you're talking to? I know you're talking to me here, but it might not always be clear who you're talking to if you don't quote what someone has said...

Yes, I know that. You have told me before how you interpret it. But, do you understand my point about the book not all being chronological? You made the argument that "Rev 20 shows that the beast and the false prophet were thrown into the lake of fire before satan is in a previous battle.". That...

But, he's not just saying that. He denies the existence of a created spirit being called the devil and named Satan, so he denies that Adam and Eve and Cain were tempted by the created spirit being named Satan and instead says they were tempted by their own spirits that he thinks are referred to...

That's the same kind of reasoning that Premils use. That doesn't automatically make your reasoning wrong, but it's something you might want to consider. But, I'm sure you understand that the events recorded in the book of Revelation are not in chronological order throughout the book. With that...

Okay. I don't feel like debating that with you here right now and maybe you don't want to do that, either. But, since you see Revelation 19:11-21 as being symbolic, then at least your reasoning for not seeing them as being the same events is not because you see them both as being literal with...

Would I have talked to you all these years on these forums if I didn't take any of your interpretations seriously? Of course not. Do I think that some of your interpretations can't be taken seriously? Of course, and I say so when that is the case. But, I don't say that about all of your...