Search results

Again, that falls short of "all truth." History proves it.

The problem with that, is it falls short of "all truth." If it were not so, there would remain no more questions, no more debates or disagreements.

Paul "pressed on"...counselling that we should go "beyond the elementary principles of Christ", who Himself said He had many more things to say to them at that time, because they could "not bear it" all then. At the same time Jesus promised to send the Holy Spirit to lead "unto all truth"-- not...

Jesus also said, "I still have many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now." And who even now could or would dare say they can bear more than the "apostles??" Heaven forbid! It's as if religious leaders have imposed a limit on those "many things" which Jesus assigned to the Holy...

That pretty well sums it up! But what we can expect--what is actually to occur, is "distress of nations...and men’s hearts failing them from fear and the expectation of those things which are coming on the earth" in relatively small enactments that are sure to be denied as even occurring--just...

Such is the worldly perspective of seeing all things through "times" as if the things of God actually reside on a timeline. Of course they do not. But no, everything of God, including our born again spirit and salvation, is "not of this world" where time is the rule. Time and the body of flesh...

The answer is here: What son of Abraham became sin that also became the sacrifice for sin? There is only One.

Okay, I hear you and have heard you, but none of that indicates that the "appointed time of the end" is specifically at the end of history, as you seem to believe. On the contrary, and I repeat, all time is "end time"-- which is to say, all times reveal sin and bring and end to death, which...

Did you point out a contradiction...other than your interpretation? I explained that, that your idea of "the last of the last days" is your own term not mentioned in the prophecy. To the contrary, the prophecy simply states the time as "the time of the end." Do you not understand that the "time...

It is your interpretation that is in error. You might start with the time "decreed for your people." The time of "transgression" is included. According to scripture, when was that-- at the end of the end as you believe? No, but at the beginning. And when is the time "until Messiah?" Surely it...

No, it has to do with you walking away from hard sayings (about Dan 9).

Oh, you mean like when Jesus said: “Most assuredly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in you. Whoever eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. For My flesh is [k]food indeed, and My...

Indeed! This is like what Jesus said: “Woe to you, blind guides, who say, ‘Whoever swears by the temple, it is nothing; but whoever swears by the gold of the temple, he is obliged to perform it.’ 17 Fools and blind! For which is greater, the gold or the temple that sanctifies the gold? 18 And...

Comment #22 But why are you denying/avoiding that I have already commented? (Rhetorical)

Okay. So this isn't about you or me per se, it's about the truth from God. In which case we either align with Him or not to our own benefit or loss. The object then being truth, I suggest we get to the bottom of it. If you have found objection with anything I have written, I invite you to...

You misunderstand and are in error. In error, because you contradict the book of Revelation and are in need of correction (if you can receive it), as the book itself declares a time of revelation beyond its writing only to come just prior to the sounding of the seventh angel...which is the...

Yes and No. ;) The current story did indeed begin when the previous story ended...but it also ended...i.e. before the foundation of the world (as it were), which is to say, this world is but a revelation of things that both were and are. The man of sin is revealed.

You are repeating yourself. I read your explanation already. I understand. You are a good student and follower of Christ--I get that. But what was written (penned) was limited by what the writers could "not bear" then. To the contrary, what I have told you is according to the sounding of the...

And so the "lie" continues until the end, for it is also written, "but each one in his own order."

You are not completely off here, it's just that you have stated it so worldly. To the contrary, the damage has already occurred in heaven and been enacted on earth with the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple. What remains then, is yes, "wars and rumors of wars", but under cover of darkness...