Search results

Just as I thought - another FALSE accusation with ZERO historical evidence. MY Bible calls that bearing "FALSE witness" (Exod. 20:16) - which is prohibited by God. Either you produce the evidence - or simply admit that you LIED. Just another empty barrel making a LOT of noise . . .

Then PRODUCE the Document, Declaration or Decree that promulgated this SALE of Indulgences. Give me the excerpt from that document that commanded the SELLING of Indulgences. You can't do it because it NEVER happened. So, be very careful about WHO you accuse of "lying" - when it's YOU who is...

Absolutely. The Church NEVEER sold Indulgences. This was NEVER sanctioned by the Church. It was an ABUSE by some in the Church to raise money. Men like Johann Tetzel in Germany - whom Luther knew well. Your ignorance of history is almost as pathetic as your refusal to publicly profess Christ...

So, you won't tell me. Just as I thought - ALL of you guys are too cowardly to answer even a simple question because you know I'll expose you. Sooooo, you can't even tell me if you're a Christian or not?? Deny Christ before men - and HE will deny YOU before the Father (Matt. 10:33) . . .

What do Indulgences or Sacraments have to do with money? Let's see how smart - or dense you are . . .

Then what faith tradition are you? OR, are you going to keep this a "secret" like every other cowardly anti-Catholic? Are you a non-Catholic, non-Orthodox Christian?

Really? Ummmm, what year did this "Revolt" happen? WHO led this "Rebellion"? WHERE is this "Catholic Church" now?? Names, years and Documents, please . . .

And as I stated before - a disjointed gaggle of people is NOT the Biblical definition of what Christ's Church is. So, tell me - WHICH one of the tens of thousands of disjointed and perpetually-splintering factio0ns of Protestantism that ALL teach different doctrines is the "True Church"? They...

Nope. I belong to the Catholic Church, of which the Bishop of Rome is Christ's earthly representative (Matt. 16:18-19, Luke 22:31-32, John 21:15-19). Not sure what the "Roman" Church or Roman Catholic Church is. Besides - MY Church doesn't "deny" what Paul wrote in 1 Tim. 2:5. We simply...

Sooooo, let me get this straight - YOU erroneously refer to the Catholic Church as the "Roman" Church - and I'm "arrogant" for pointing that out?? Are you on something??

Sooooo, are you saying that you LIED in post #148 when you said it's "Me , ITS JESUS and THE BIBLE and ANYONE ELSE who wants to gather in HIS name ."?? Are you "vacating" because I exposed you?

Are you saying that "Lambs" are ignoramuses?

See post #155. Yours is an UNBIBLICAL view of the Church.

Then you truly DON'T know your Bible - do you? Jesus explicitly states that HIS Church is a visible entity - a city on a hill that cannot be hidden (Matt. 5:14). According to YOU - it's a disjointed gaggle of Lone Ranger believers all over the world - just "Jesus and the Bible". Too bad...

And how does being an ignoramus allow one to expose anything but their own shortcomings?? Can you explain?

Huh?? Ex-Catholics, whom experience has shown me are the who are MOST ignorant of Catholic teaching are a "danger" to the Church?? Can you explain that one to m, Einstein? As for your "Lone Ranger" version of Christianity - if you actually KNEW your Bible (and it's obvious that you don't), you...

What a relief! I belong to the Catholic Church. NOT even sure what the "Roman" Church is . . .

The "RCC" still doesn't exist. The Catholic Church does - the SAME one Paul was referring to in 1 Tim. 3:15.

This statement doesn't even make sense in its complete absurdity.

This post wins for "Most Asinine Post of the Thread". Sola Scriptura means Scripture Alone is our SOLE Authority. When YOU say that it doesn't have to be proven by Scripture - you are DENYING the very Authority you purport to be our "SOLE" Authority. You're a living, breathing contradiction...