Search results

non sequitur

and what is yours?

yes, the preeminence of Jesus trumps all.....thats the gospel I have come to believe.....from reading the scriptures. Here is a chart of emotions. Which ones am I rallying on? :)

So, you promise to be faithful to the girl you marry when down the track another catches your eye.....and you marry her as well. What happened to the promise of faithfulness? ....and do you promise the second one to till a third catches your eye? Somehow I can't escape the conclusion that a bit...

then why make the charge that I'm rallying on emotions or are you just repeating what others have falsely claimed?

who is rallying on emotions amigo?....oh, you mean me? Could you point out in my posts where I am rallying on emotions?

I notice there's a lot of 'they's' and similar pointing to the mistakes or perceived mistakes of others....hmmm

I am making an appeal based on the preeminence of Jesus.

I am making an appeal based on the preeminence of Jesus.

Thoughtful questions knock at the door of preconceived ideas. It is the way God challenges those he loves. Error is threatened and truth is confirmed. 'Too deep' is an interesting comment. Does it imply undeveloped discernment? Does it imply a lazy half hearted interest? Does it imply a...

It is assumed God killed them. I think exposure of what they deemed hidden generated a heart attack and God is made responsible. Uzzah died for touching it but what about all the Philistines that did the same and didn't die? Keeping in mind that the Hebrews believed God was responsible for...

ahhh, unfortunate Pearl. However, I think it is worth saving to a memory stick and watching on someone else's computer. :)

Paul defines God's wrath in Romans 1:18-31. He 'gives them over', vs 24, 26 and 28. What does he give them over to?... to the naturally resulting consequences of their choices.....depravity, breakdown and finally death. It appears to me that you want to define God's wrath as some arbitrary...

Johann, who are you a witness of/ to? an angry wrathful God. Do you threaten your unbelieving neighbours with hell fire and brimstone under the guise of being God's witness? Is that the 'good news' you purvey?.....cuz it sure sounds like it. Even a brother who attempts to present Jesus (the...

Unpersuasive Johann. Did Jesus ever talk of those who were opposed to him in this manner? Therein is the litmus test of the spirit which one operates by.

Your response confirms to me that you didn't watch the presentation. If you had and you disagree, you would address that which you found objectionable. Instead, you choose to cast a poor light on it by labelling it with an unjustified pejorative. hmmmm

The operative principle if you have missed it is, Jesus is the final authority. It appears to me you never heard the presentation and have just assumed an outcome. ....and are you desirous of solutions or are you desirous of being objectionable?

Your spin/ perception, I'm not doing that at all. ....and now you go into a lengthy explanation in an attempt to nullify a position I do not hold ....a point of view you have imagined I've made, to quote you, '"selling" me your brand-a bloodless gospel, a cross-less gospel.'

With respect Johann, I find your responses contrary to your claim of not setting up hoops to jump through. It's as though you require the whole cake baked just as as we have pulled the flour out of its container and if it's not, you question the integrity of the ingredients. It appears to me...

Pearl, I think you could be interested in this presentation....