Search results

Multiple Old Testament passages had predicted the ingathering of countless Gentiles into the covenant family. There was no sense of division or inferiority in those predictions. Quite the opposite! Jews and Gentiles would equally experience full salvation through the vicarious work of Christ in...

The coming (or parousia) of the Lord is when Jesus comes to rescue all His elect and destroy all the wicked. That is the only two peoples that He recognizes on planet earth. You invent a 3rd group that are too wicked be rescued yet too righteous to be destroyed. Who is this invented people...

Pretrib is based upon extra-biblical theories, private opinion, odious amounts of "by implication," much double-speak and convoluted language, forced fabricated types, and man-made terms. Where in the Bible does it say that "the Church ... is gathered from heaven and the seed of the woman, the...

Admin needs to get your mum's email and tell her you are online unsupervised.

I know. LOL. The sad think it: you are spot on. People need to call it out. Many swallow this nonsense that enjoys no biblical roots. It is a Jesuit doctrine.

LOL. Stop downplaying it. It is a complete mess. They cannot even provide one single proof text. They cannot even frame a compelling argument. It is utter confusion. It is ridiculous.

Can you (1) remove your Pretrib glasses for a moment, (2) check the color coding below, and (3) piece the jigsaw puzzle together yourself. Check out the likeness, continuity and correlation between what all the Scripture. They all describe the same coming, on the same day, producing the same...

Pretrib hermeneutics are horrible. They make it up as they go. Where anywhere in Jeremiah does it mention a rapture of the church, followed by a 7 years trib followed by a 3rd coming, never mind Jeremiah 30? You misinterpret an Old Testament prophecy (Jeremiah 30) that expressly relates to the...

What does this mean? That has never happened or ever will. I have yet to see 1 Pretrib verse in the inspired pages. Can you show us Scripture that clearly describes (1) a rapture of the Church, (2) immediately followed by a literal seven-year tribulation, (3) immediately followed by a further...

I did it above but you ignored. I will repost. Jesus said in Luke 17:24-34: “For as the lightning, that lighteneth out of the one part under heaven, shineth unto the other part under heaven; so shall also the Son of man be in his day. But first must he suffer many things, and be rejected of...

I will give this a stab. Jesus said in Matthew 25:1-13: “Then shall the kingdom of heaven be likened unto ten virgins, which took their lamps, and went forth to meet the bridegroom. And five of them were wise, and five were foolish. They that were foolish took their lamps, and took no oil with...

You wallow in ad hominem. Your posts ooze bitterness. Sad! All the time you can't even present 1 proof text that supports Pretrib. Telling! No wonder you are frustrated. I honestly think you are paranoid. I have not edited anything. But trying to change you is (indeed) pointless, but there are...

Yaa-dee-daa-dee-daa!!! What Scripture teaches a rapture of the Church, immediately followed by a literal seven-year tribulation, immediately followed by a further coming of Christ?

So, you moved from a position that is supported by multiple Scripture to one that is supported by zero Scripture? How smart! How wise! How commendable! Not! It is hard to take your Posttrib claim seriously, especially when one sees how ignorant you are of the basics of Posttrib. It sounds like...

When Pretribbers cannot attack the message (which is always) they default to attacking the messenger. Goes with the territory!!!

No you cannot. Only God can do that. You really think too highly of yourself. Everyone is angry, sullen, closed minded apart from you. You are so thin-skinned. Your ad hominem doesn't mask your avoidance and lack of Scripture.

From what i recall, Morgan Edwards presented that to his professor as a hypothetical thesis, which he did not believe, for a college exam paper. He never taught it to his followers, neither did they advocate it. He was definately not a Dispensatanist.

Exactly. It is called being programed. Pretrib has to be taught. You would never find it.

While i disagree with your interpretation, it is refreshing for someone to address the counter arguments. Prettibbers do not seem to know how to do that. My last post still stands, and i believe refutes this. Please re-read.

You are wasting your time. He is constantly imposing what he has been taught upon the inspired pages. You are debating with his teachers.