Search results

You totally avoided his question.

Where is a rapture (or the second coming) mentioned in Daniel 9?

Where is a 7-yr tribulation in that passage?

Where is your Scripture that teaches a rapture of the church, followed by a 7 years trib followed by a 3rd coming?

Why do you keep copying and pasting this opinion on this forum without biblical support? This is mere private interpretation, and faulty opinion at that. Where is your Scripture that teaches a rapture of the church, followed by a 7 years trib followed by a 3rd coming?

Does it take 7 yrs for a Jewish Wedding to be consummated? Of course not. This is another Pretrib invention that has no connection to reality or God's infallible Word. No scripture passage anywhere in the Bible compares a Pretrib rapture coming of the Lord to a 7 year or 7 day supposed Jewish...

That seems to be the thrust of your postings. You attack the messenger instead of the message.

(1) The first part (7 weeks) relates to the rebuilding of Jerusalem. (2) The second part (62 weeks) takes up to the beginning of Christ’s earthly ministry. (3) The third part (1 week) begins with the start of Christ’s public ministry (AD 27) and sees the crucifixion half way through it (AD...

The new covenant made half way through the week is active until the end.

Daniel 9:26 says: “the people of the prince that shall come (speaking of the Roman soldiers) shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.” In Daniel 9:27 after predicting that the old covenant would...

When Jesus cried it is finished, the old covenant sacrifice system was finished. This was reinforced by the ripping of the temple curtain in two. Christ was the final sacrifice for sin. Hebrews 7:27 says of Christ and His final atonement, “Who needeth not daily, as those high priests, to offer...

This doesn't add up. This is horrible hermeneutics. History shows that the 490 years were linear, congruent and sequential. Those of us that take 490 years to mean exactly that do not have to prove that it is harmonious; we just have to accept what it states. We take it literally (1) because it...

You are back to the way you used to communicate years ago. Because you cannot refute your opponents you try to belittle, taunt, misrepresent or attack them. This totally nullifies everything you write. When someone disagrees with you they are supposedly defending false teaching. When you do...

My aim is to discuss what Scripture teaches, let it speak for itself and support it with other similar Scripture. I do not appreciate your ad hominem when someone disagrees with you.

Fullness of the Gentiles, Instead of continually running your mouth off all the time, can you provide hard evidence to support your beliefs? No! You are unable to corroborate Premil. That is because it is simply not there. I challenge you to a public debate to see who has corroboration for...

Both Revelation 20 and Hebrews 12 describe the disembodied state of the dead in Christ, albeit covering different detail. Both relate to the same time period.

Not true. This is a heavenly scene. It is describing the disembodied saints on high after suffering in this life. That was not possible until Jesus conquered the grave. The victory is shown to come from the first resurrection (Christ's). Do you deny that? What is nore, the Gospel just went out...

Not so! Hebrews 12:22-24 says, “But ye are come (plural perfect active indicative) unto mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels, To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God...

Not so! Sin was not paid for in full then. The grave was not defeated then. Hades was not emptied then. It is impossible for that to be true.

That seems to be the foundation of all your interactions: if it cuts across your opinion of Revelation 20 then you cannot allow it. That is insane hermeneutics.