Search results

What that statement is saying is that a bible ve What the statement is saying is that a blibical verse can't be interpreted in a way to contradict the message of the bible

I'm not saying that what i'm saying is that it can't be literal What I'm saying is that what matters is that you die for Christ not how you die for Christ

Lets think about this so if you are beheaded for Christ you can be resurrected in Rev 20:4 but if shot dead for Christ you won't?

We need to remember that there are ex satanist who have converted to Christianity. I’m not just saying what I think and believe I’m showing what the bible teaches us by not contradicting itself

The only way they are not a contradiction if a matter of what the mark is. If it’s a literal mark then it’s a contradiction if it’s symbolic of the mark on the forehead being devoted to the beast and the mark on the right hand doing the beast will then its not a contradiction. The hardening...

I didn’t say that the saved will I’m talking about the unsaved. People also hear about the gospel and reject it and then accept it later on in life. The point is these scriptures below guarantee salvation to all who accept. Romans 10:13 for, "Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be...

The point is that John 3:16 states that anyone who believes will be saved no matter what just like Paul who was persecuting the church. This tells us that the mark can't be literal but but a symbolic unrepentant devotion to the beast which is form of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit which...

Im not talking about Christians taking the mark I’m talking about non Christians. If someone takes the mark (if a literal mark) not knowing what exactly it is only to feed their family and then realizes what it is of course God would let them repent because He is the God of John 3:16. If Paul...

So do you think that someone could take the literal mark and John 3:16 wouldn't apply to them?

Yes but I do believe that the sea beast was Rome and the land beast was apostate Israel

Yes it happened at that time

Sorry but i'm not quite sure what you mean

How can they be the same event when one is the defeat of Babylon the great by the beast and the other is the defeat of the beast and the false prophet by Jesus?

I didn’t say satan I said the beast Revelation 17:16-17 16 The beast and the ten horns you saw will hate the prostitute. They will bring her to ruin and leave her naked;they will eat her flesh and burn her with fire. 17 For God has put it into their hearts to accomplish his purpose by...

Nice one

The wedding Revelation 19 clearly shows that the wedding supper happens after Babylon the great is destroyed before the beast is destroyed and revelation 20 clearly shows that the coming with fire is after the thousand years. Remember revelation 17 shows us that it is the beast who destroyed...

Who would the Jews living in the time of Antiochus Epehanies though that Daniel was talking to in the 70 weeks?

The message of the 70 weeks was an answer to the prayer Daniel was praying because Jeremiahs 70 years were ending and the people hadn’t repeated. Thus the 70 years became 70 weeks of years. Jesus nor any New Testament writer ever claimed that Jesus fulfilled any of the 70 weeks

John 3:16 can’t stand if people can’t repent of the mark if the mark is a literal mark

How can they be the same event when one is the defeat of Babylon the great by the beast and the other is the defeat of the beast and the false prophet by Jesus?