Search results

The seventh angel/trumpet doesn't remotely mention a thousand years. Your linkage is wrong. It does not add up.

I was referring to previous points. You are ignoring multiple strong points here that challenge your opinion. It is pointless going on further until you address these.

The “elements” in view in 2 Peter 3 that “melt with fervent heat” when Jesus comes as “a thief in the night” obviously relate to creation. That is the context that Peter is talking about. He’s talking about the removal of the entire fallen visible physical system. The word denotes the...

These are all Full Preterist arguments and they butcher the literal wording and context of plain straightforward Scripture. I will take this a confession that you have no answer for Amil.

Time after time, as the Premillennialist theology is closely examined by the Word of God, it is shown to be wanting. Whilst they boast of a literal attitude to the interpretation of Scripture, passage after passage that is clear and literal in its meaning is explained away in order to sustain...

Not at all! Quite the opposite! In fact, the objective Bible student (before he is indoctrinated by man) quickly realizes that Revelation is saturated in figurative language. The fact you fight that is testimony to how selective you are in your studies. The foremost consideration when studying...

Not so! Like Full Preterists, Premils are having to move away from a literal reading of Scripture in order for their theology to fit. It is, in fact, classic Amils that are now carrying the literalist banner.

Premils are becoming more like Full Preterists by the day in order to somehow justify Premil in the light of numerous climactic Scriptures. This is a testimony to the strength of the Amil argument on forums like this. It is fun to watch. Your fight is with the sacred text.

LOL. You come to some absurd conclusions.

More error from a heretic who denies the literal physical future coming of Christ.

First and importantly: as you well know: there is no 1,000 years mentioned (or recognized) in this passage. You have to force it into the sacred text. The reality is: this passage forbids it. The end is indeed the end! This proves that the coming of Christ is climactic and final. Second, there...

There is a difference between the deceiver and the deceived. Sin kicked in when Eve embraced the lie of the devil and then acted upon it. She then became a sinner. The same happens to your billions of religious phonies who do the same in your supposed future millennium. They listen Satan...

No! Address the Op and we can maybe go places.

There is a difference between the voice of the seventh angel (which i believe refers to his time of assignment just before and up to the end) and the trumpet blast (which introduces Christ's appearing). I think you are wrongly equating them both. The word for "sound" is salpizō meaning to...

Here is the elephant in the room for your belief. You keep stating this as if it is a fact, when it is not. It is your private opinion. You impose that upon the sacred text. You then build your opinion upon your opinion. That is not smart. Chronos in Scripture does not = 1000 years, it equals...

So, can you furnish me with another solid Amil writer/teacher who promotes this? Or, are you the only one God has given this special revelation to? This is what Tim does all the time and we hit him hard for it.

Totally agree bro. You are spot on. Revelation 10:7 instructs: “But in the days of the voice of the seventh angel, when he shall begin to sound, [Gr. mellō salpizō or intend or about to sound a blast] the mystery of God should be finished, as he hath declared to his servants the prophets.”

You cannot seem to see that “the days of the voice of the seventh angel” do not need to be synonymous with an actual trumpet blast, that various other Scripture clearly and repeatedly attributes to Jesus actual appearing. The blast occurs in “the days of the voice of the seventh angel” but is...

I do not agree. You are taking one Scripture and placing a meaning upon it that carries zero corroboration elsewhere in the Word. This is a classic Premil mistake. There is a difference between "the days of the voice of the seventh angel" which refer to his assignment and when he actually makes...

I think you are overly complicating things bro and creating something that is uncorroborated by other Scripture. It is notable when you look at the seventh vial being poured out by the seventh angel in Revelation 16, that this angel is active in pouring out judgment upon earth prior to the...