Search results

Because despite you denying it, there is such a thing as unitarian Christians. Therefore, it is inappropriate to move it to a non-Christian thread. I'm glad they revoked the rule to talk about your heresy. If you do not want to talk about it, you do know that you are not required to post in...

It's not about men. Feminists are frightened off by these things. Ever hear of division of labor? I told my wife from the beginning that I don't want her to do the hard work.

Powerful tweet

See dichotomy attached.

No, we are not saved by doctrine. Even Biblical and spiritually sound doctrine is harmful when it becomes an IDOL. Doctrine is the theory. Living the Christian life is the practice. I've told the stories of my grandmothers many times. Devout Catholics they were. Theologians, they weren't.

Trinitarians cannot simply answer the simple question; does it make sense that God (Jesus) has a God? The mental gymnastics is fun to watch.

The juxtaposition is proof text and it is ubiquitous. There are 2 people in this verse. God and his son. If they were the same person, language would not be used to indicate they are 2. And again, notice how the the Holy Spirit gets dissed?

A title for the Anointed is not a name for YHWH.

@face2face, see? Just like I said. They claim mountains of support exist while ignoring the trinity is not in the Bible.

I don’t have to prove it. The burden is on you, who are making a positive claim. This is how logic, law and statistics work.

IDOLATRY.

No Scripture says this.

Conceding that God’s words can mean whatever you want them to mean.

What verse says this? Trinitarians do not recognize the contradiction of their doctrine. P1. God is a committee of 3. P2. One member of this committee is ‘fully’ God. C. 3 = 1

Well, the reason is because trinitarians abuse language, pervert montheism to mean 3in1. Therefore, unitarianism strikes a more precise contrast with trinitarianism.

You are deliberately confusing WHAT's with WHO's. Words are WHAT's. The chosen servant of God is a WHO.

With the possible exception of Luke, all the Biblical authors were unitarian Jews who reject the trinity to this day. So, you must interpret their writings from this monotheist perspective.

You are fully indoctrinated as it has been proven many different ways and many times. What constitutes proof for you and do you apply this very same standard to the anti-Biblical claim or do you merely accept 3=1 as a given?

This is what @Eternally Grateful does not get. There is no such thing as proof by assertion. Asserting a certain verse or chapter proves something does not make it so. In this way, they are misquoting Scripture, asserting it means something the author did not intend, out of context, etc. For...

What's funny is you cannot recognize the presumptions you make to "support" your doctrine.