Search results

Daniel 2:45 says FIVE successive world powers, of which the Fifth is "divided" between the Daniel 7 Three Superpowers and the U.N. Scripture and History are simple, -- it's the Religious False Doctrines that confuse things, Bobby Jo

Makes no difference. The argument still stands, -- and it's correct --, versus the nonsense which passes for "Posts". Bobby Jo

THREE errors: 1. The a/c is NOT a "politician". He's the world's most senior Political Statesman who is also a Jew, and he has never run for office, but has been appointed to a Cabinet level position. 2. He doesn't work "miracles" and he's not a "Christian". He's a Jew and he doesn't...

This is correct. But it doesn't answer who the Seven Kings (and Eighth) ARE! Perhaps if one were to follow the Daniel 2:45 FIVE, and discover that Chapter 7 presents the Fifth - "divided" FOUR, then we might find the Seven and the Eighth. What Was I Thinking?!? I must have had some sort of...

Hahahahahahahaha, -- LOOK EVERYONE -- I HAVE DISCOVERED MATH. But it really doesn't matter because GOD will change it. thanks for the laugh, Bobby Jo

What nonsense! Are there seven Popes? Seven Districts? Seven Sects? Seven Thoughts as to why you should make such an unfounded assertion? LOOK EVERYONE -- I have a THEORY, -- of course it has no FACTS or SUBSTANTIATION, but I'm going to DECLARE IT AS A TRUTH. Where do these people come...

... the difference between the discussions in this "Topic" and the Five Blind Men and the Elephant, is that the Five Blind Men didn't have anyone to explain that they were assessing different aspects of ONE ELEPHANT. So they were at an INFORMATIONAL disadvantage. But the "presenters" in this...

It's a good thing we have ALL kind of people in this world. Those who understand History and can present a reasonable assessment of FACTS, -- and those who can't. Perhaps "G.E" should consider the former. Whew, Bobby Jo

Bobby Jo said: ↑ People ignorantly debate the "merits" of the Shroud and the Sudarium (face cloth). They use the text -- which has it's own limitation; they use their logic -- which has it's own limitations; but they seldom use Science. And if they do use "Science" they selectively choose...

Luke 22:35 And he said to them, “When I sent you out with no purse or bag or sandals, did you lack anything?” They said, “Nothing.” 36 He said to them, “But now, let him who has a purse take it, and likewise a bag. And let him who has no sword sell his mantle and buy one. Yep, it's ALL IN MY...

You gave platitudes, excuses, justifications, and every form of non-answer, -- but deny O B E D I E N C E. But that's ok, your blood is on your own head. As Alfred E. Newman said: "What, Me Worry?" Good Luck! :) Bobby Jo

GOD doesn't violate HIS own Word, but YOU claim HIS authority while disobeying HIS Word: Luke 22:35 And he said to them, “When I sent you out with no purse or bag or sandals, did you lack anything?” They said, “Nothing.” 36 He said to them, “But now, let him who has a purse take it, and...

We start with Scripture which is then revealed. We DON'T start with your imagination of what Scripture SHOULD have said ... Luke 22:35 And he said to them, “When I sent you out with no purse or bag or sandals, did you lack anything?” They said, “Nothing.” 36 He said to them, “But now, let him...

... that "faith-based-ignorance" is better than "faith-based-FACTS". It seems that the church leadership is too ill-informed/lazy/stupid to present anything more than their worthless "TRUST ME". Or how about: "This Is MY Church, what I say comes from GOD!" Or how about: "It's my job to hear...

We start with Scripture, which is revealed in it's fullness. -- We don't start by contradicting Scripture, and then hear from an "angel of light". :) Bobby Jo

There is lore, myth, and fact. The Lead Chemist on the STURP team I personally spoke to only identified the circumstance where samples were switched during off hours; and the lack of a micro photograph of the sample in question prior to being destructively carbon dated. But to me, it's more...

2 Samuel 24:12 “Go and say to David, ‘Thus says the Lord, Three things I offere]" you; choose one of them, that I may do it to you.’” 13 So Gad came to David and told him, and said to him, “Shall three" years of famine come to you in your land? Or will you flee three months before your foes...

Scripture is the criteria, and it starts with dictionaries (not your imagination of what you WISH it had said); and includes LOGIC: Isaiah 1:18 “Come now, let us reason together, says the Lord ... But your false doctrines supersede BOTH! :) Bobby Jo

I believe that Bill Clinton tried to redefine what the Dictionary said to suit his own distortions of the truth: "It depends on what the meaning of "is" is." Perhaps you should apply Luke 22:35 and Luke 22:36 to their respective contexts. -- Or just make stuff up to suit your own agenda...

Rev. 13:16 Also it causes all, both small and great, both rich and poor, both free and slave, to be marked on the right hand or the forehead, 17 so that no one can buy or sell unless he has the mark, that is, the name of the beast or the number of its name. You shouldn't trust your own...